O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 9-9-82 (2019)
Compensation of arbitrators and referee
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The arbitrators and referee shall have such compensation for their services as may be agreed upon by the parties in the submission.
History
Code 1933, § 7-423, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 2270, § 2; Code 1981, § 9-9-132;
Code 1981, § 9-9-82, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1988, p. 903, § 3.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1988–1994 · leading case: Tampa Motel Mgmt. Co. v. Stratton of Florida, Inc., 366 S.E.2d 804 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).
Tampa Motel Mgmt. Co. v. Stratton of Florida, Inc., 366 S.E.2d 804 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988). “The Georgia arbitration code provides that it is applicable “only to construction contracts, contracts of warranty on construction, and contracts involving the architectural or engineering design of any building or the design of alterations or additions thereto .”
Bishop Contracting Co., Inc. v. Ctr. Bros., Inc., 445 S.E.2d 780 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). “” This contract is governed by former OCGA § 9-9-82 which provided “[a] written agreement to submit any existing controversy to arbitration or a provision in a written contract to submit any controversy thereafter arising to arbitration is enforceable and confers jurisdiction on…”
Mitchem v. Joe N. Guy Co., 395 S.E.2d 331 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). “See OCGA §§ 9-9-82 and 9-9-83 (prior to amendment effective July 1, 1988, Ga.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.