Interpreting new evidence code provisions and statutory meaning
Also stated as: Statutory and Code Interpretation Principles
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Interpreting new evidence code provisions and statutory meaning
- Cited for: Interpreting code language to state existing law
- Cited for: Interpreting code sections as a single, consistent body of law
- Cited for: Interpreting unoriginal code sections as codification of existing law
Ranked by how often Georgia courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Georgia opinions citing these pages
- Corley v. State, 840 S.E.2d 391 (Ga. 2020)
- State v. Almanza, 304 Ga. 553 (2018)
- Hendrix v. State, 303 Ga. 525 (2018)
- Chrysler Grp. LLC v. Walden, 812 S.E.2d 244 (Ga. 2018)
- McKoy v. State, 812 S.E.2d 293 (Ga. 2018)
- McKoy v. State, 303 Ga. 327 (2018)
- Chrysler Grp. LLC v. Walden, 303 Ga. 358 (2018)
- Eller v. State, 303 Ga. 373 (2018)
- Lucas v. State, 810 S.E.2d 490 (Ga. 2018)
- Lucas v. State, 810 S.E.2d 491 (Ga. 2018)
- State v. Antonio Tapia Almanza, No. A17A1270 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2017)
- Smith v. State, 805 S.E.2d 251 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017)
- Jackson v. State, 804 S.E.2d 367 (Ga. 2017)
- Jackson v. State, No. S17A1128 (Ga. Aug. 28, 2017)
- Gibbs v. State, 800 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 10 opinions
- 41 opinions
- 15 opinions
- 27 opinions
- 32 opinions
- 69 opinions
Filed under: Lenity and Stare Decisis in Construction
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law