Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 103
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 103-22 (2026)

  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §103-22  REPEALED.  L Sp 1993, c 8, §26.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1980–2012 · leading case: Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Dep't of Budget & Fin., 876 P.2d 1300 (Haw. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Dep't of Budget & Fin., 876 P.2d 1300 (Haw. 1994). · cites it 26× “In addition, Crosby reviewed Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 103, Expenditure of Public Money and Public Contracts, arid concluded that HRS § 103-22 (Supp.1992) 2 mandated selection of a consultant for the project through competitive bid.”
Alaka'i Na Keiki, Inc. v. Matayoshi, 277 P.3d 988 (Haw. 2012). · cites it 4× “, HRS §§ 103-22, 103-25 through 103-32 (1976).”
Iuli v. Fasi, 613 P.2d 653 (Haw. 1980). · cites it 6× “The action charges the defendants with wilful and intentional violation of HRS § 103-22 1 and § 8-301(3) 2 of the 1973 Honolulu Charter authorizing an “Interim Agreement” executed between the City and MTL.”
Martinez v. Espinas, 938 F. Supp. 650 (D. Haw. 1996). “§ 103-22 was not a “rule” under the HAPA but “simply an internal guideline that the Comptroller [or the Government] may ignore or not,” inasmuch as the circular “was sent only to other state agencies and does not command or prohibit any action by any member of the public or any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.