Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 103
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 103-25 (2026)

to 32  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §§103-25 to 32  REPEALED.  L Sp 1993, c 8, §§31 to 38.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1972–1974 · leading case: Hawaii Corp. v. Kim, 500 P.2d 1165 (Haw. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hawaii Corp. v. Kim, 500 P.2d 1165 (Haw. 1972). · cites it 48× “HRS § 103-25 provides: Qualifications of bidders.”
Town v. Land Use Comm'n, 524 P.2d 84 (Haw. 1974). · cites it 12× “2d 1165 (1972), a case involving the failure of the appellant to give notice of its intention to bid on a state contract by the specified statutory deadline which was not to be later than six days prior to the opening of bids, we held: We are of the opinion that the time…”
Fed. Elec. Corp. v. Fasi, 527 P.2d 1284 (Haw. 1974). · cites it 2× “2 HRS § 103-25. We stated as much when we said in Air Terminal Services, supra: If a pai'ticular bidder was thought to be positively unqualified, either from the standpoint of competence or any other, then under [the statute] and [Wilson] there had *66 to be a hearing thereon,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.