Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-23 (2026)

Changing register; striking names of disqualified voters

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§11-23 Changing register; striking names of disqualified voters. Whenever the clerk receives from the department of health or any informing agency, information of the death, loss of voting rights of a person sentenced for a felony as provided in section 831-2, adjudication as an incapacitated person under the provisions of chapter 560, loss of citizenship, or any other disqualification to vote, the clerk may accept the reported information as prima facie evidence to maintain and update the general register. Any person whose name is removed from the register of voters under this section may reregister to vote or appeal in the manner provided by sections 11-26 and 11-51, and the proceedings shall be had upon the appeal as in other appeals under these sections. [L 1970, c 26, pt of §2; am L 1980, c 198, §1; am L 1983, c 34, §1; am L 2002, c 15, §2; am L 2021, c 213, §10]

Case Notes

Cited: 133 H. 229 (App.), 325 P.3d 641 (2014).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1960–2014 · leading case: Re App. C/C Clerk Re Regis. Buda, 352 P.2d 846 (Haw. 1960).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Re App. C/C Clerk Re Regis. Buda, 352 P.2d 846 (Haw. 1960). · cites it 16× “" The sole issue raised by the parties on this appeal is whether the procedure followed by the Japanese court in convicting the applicant was "in due course of law." We have no warrant to consider that issue, for the appeal is not properly before this court.”

In re the Appeal of Chung, 352 P.2d 846 (Haw. 1960). · cites it 16× “” We have no warrant to consider that issue, for the appeal is not properly before this court.”

Hussey v. Say, 325 P.3d 641 (Haw. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Act 26 amended the Hawaii Revised Statutes by adding chapter 11, which includes HRS §§ 11-23 and 11-25. 1970 Haw. Sess. Laws Act 26, § 2 at 24-25.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.