Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 134
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-16 (2025)

  REPEALED

✓ laws through the 2025 session: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §134-16  REPEALED.  L 2021, c 183, §8.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2021 · leading case: George Young, Jr. v. State of Hawaii, 992 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
George Young, Jr. v. State of Hawaii, 992 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2021). “134 (“[I]f a federal statute is found facially defective it ‘is void in guns, HRS § 134-16; switchblades, id. § 134-52; and butterfly knives, id.”
State v. Rivera, 716 S.E.2d 859 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011). “Possession of a stun gun is a crime in Hawaii ( Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-16 (a) (2007)), New Jersey (N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.