Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 15-10 (2026)

  Counting of absentee ballots

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §15-10  Counting of absentee ballots.  If the requirements in section 15-9 are met, the return and ballot envelopes may be opened and the ballot counted as prescribed by law for the voting system in use. [L 1975, c 36, pt of §3; am L 1976, c 106, §4(5); am L 1980, c 248, §1(g); am L 2019, c 136, §31]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1983–2019 · leading case: Waters v. Nago, 468 P.3d 60 (Haw. 2019).
Waters v. Nago, 468 P.3d 60 (Haw. 2019). · cites it 3× “HRS § 15-10 (2009); see also, e.g., HAR §§ 3-174-11 (procedure for validating signatures on voter affirmation statements); 3-174-12 (procedure for processing damaged, duplicate, or unidentifiable absentee return envelopes); 3-174- 13 (procedure for receiving absentee return…”
Charley's Taxi Radio Dispatch Corp. v. Sida of Hawaii, Inc., 562 F. Supp. 712 (D. Haw. 1983). “…of transportation or such other officer as may be designated by the director. [L 1947, c 32, pt of § 1; RL 1955, § 15-10; am L SP 1959 2d, c 1, § 26; am L 1962, c 24, §§ 2, 3; HRS § 261-5; am L 1968, c 20, § 2; am L 1969, c 10, § 6 and c 99, § 1] Haw.Rev.Stat. § 261-7: §…”
Deak-Perera Hawaii, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp., 553 F. Supp. 976 (D. Haw. 1983). “Such rebate may be granted during the next succeeding fiscal year but shall not exceed one-half cent per gallon per person, and shall be computed on the total number of gallons for which the tax was paid by such person, for such fiscal year.”
Iwasa v. Nago, 148 Haw. 46 (Haw. 2019). · cites it 3× “HRS § 15-10 (2009); see also, e.g., HAR §§ 3-174-11 (procedure for validating signatures on voter affirmation statements); 3-174-12 (procedure for processing damaged, duplicate, or unidentifiable absentee return envelopes); 3-174- 13 (procedure for receiving absentee return…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.