Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 235-114 (2026)

  Appeals

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

APPEAL

 

     §235-114  Appeals.  (a)  Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter set forth.  Appeal may be made either to the taxation board of review or to the tax appeal court.  The first appeal to either the taxation board of review or to the tax appeal court may be made without payment of the tax assessed.  Either the taxpayer or the assessor may appeal to the tax appeal court from a decision by the board or to the intermediate appellate court from a decision by the tax appeal court; provided that if the decision by the board or the tax appeal court is appealed by the taxpayer, or the decision by the board in favor of the department is not appealed, the taxpayer shall pay the tax assessed plus interest as provided in section 231-39(b)(4).

     (b)  If the appeal is first made to the board, the appeal shall either be heard by the board or be transferred to the tax appeal court for hearing at the election of the taxpayer or employer.  If heard by the board, an appeal shall lie from the decision thereof to the tax appeal court and to the intermediate appellate court, subject to chapter 602, in the manner and with the costs provided by chapter 232.  The supreme court shall prescribe forms to be used in the appeals.  The forms shall show:

     (1)  The amount of taxes or liability upon the basis of the taxpayer's computation of the taxpayer's taxable income or the employer's computation of the employer's liability;

     (2)  The amount upon the basis of the assessor's computation;

     (3)  The amount upon the basis of the decisions of the taxation board of review and tax appeal court, if any; and

     (4)  The amount in dispute.

If or when the appeal is filed with or transferred to the tax appeal court, the court shall proceed to hear and determine the appeal, subject to appeal to the intermediate appellate court as is provided in chapter 232.

     (c)  Any taxpayer or employer appealing from any assessment of income taxes or liability shall lodge with the assessor or assistant assessor a notice of the appeal in writing, stating the ground of the taxpayer's or employer's objection to the additional assessment or any part thereof.  The taxpayer or employer also shall file the notice of appeal with the board or the tax appeal court at any time within thirty days subsequent to the date when the notice of assessment was mailed, properly addressed to the taxpayer or employer at the taxpayer's or employer's last known residence or place of business.  Except as otherwise provided, the manner of taking the appeal, the costs applicable thereto, and the hearing and disposition thereof, including the distribution of costs and of taxes paid by the taxpayer pending the appeal, shall be as provided in chapter 232.

     The tax appeal court may allow an individual taxpayer to file a subsequent appeal without payment of the net income tax in cases where the total tax liability does not exceed $50,000 in the aggregate for all tax years, upon proof that the taxpayer would be irreparably injured by payment of the tax. [L Sp 1957, c 1, pt of §2; Supp, §121-46; am L 1967, c 37, §1; HRS §235-114; am L 1973, c 51, §3; gen ch 1985; am L 1992, c 147, §3; am L 2000, c 199, §2; am L 2004, c 123, §1 and c 202, §25; am L 2006, c 91, §2 and c 94, §1; am L 2010, c 109, §1; am L 2021, c 118, §16]

 

Rules of Court

 

  See Tax Appeal Court Rules.

 

Case Notes

 

  Provides avenue for a full and fair consideration of taxpayer's challenge to gross receipts tax.  742 F.2d 546 (1984).

  Taxpayer's 42 U.S.C. §1983 claim against validity of Hawaii's general excise tax barred, where state remedies available to taxpayer were "plain, adequate, and complete".  940 F. Supp. 260 (1995).

  Mandamus to compel issuance of certificate of appeal.  18 H. 362 (1907).

  Where taxpayer failed to pay the assessed tax as required by this section, the tax appeal court lacked jurisdiction for taxpayer's appeal and properly dismissed appeal.  108 H. 69 (App.), 116 P.3d 711 (2005).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: Tax Appeal of Lewis v. Kawafuchi, 116 P.3d 711 (Haw. App. 2005).
Tax Appeal of Lewis v. Kawafuchi, 116 P.3d 711 (Haw. App. 2005). · cites it 20× “Consequently, we hold that a separately filed judgment was not required as a prerequisite to an appeal to this court and we have jurisdiction to consider Lewis's appeal from the February 4, 2004 decisions of the TAC.”
Kinkaid v. Bd. of Review of the City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 104 P.3d 905 (Haw. 2004). · cites it 4× “, HRS § 235-114 (2001) (income tax assessments); id.”
In Re of the Tax Appeal of Maile Sky Court Co. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 936 P.2d 672 (Haw. 1997). · cites it 2× “, HRS § 235-114 (1993) (appeal of income tax); HRS § 237-42 (1993) (appeal of general excise tax); HRS § 238-8 (1993) (appeal of use tax); HRS § 245-10 (1993) (appeal of tobacco tax).”
In Re the Tax Appeal of Simpson Manor, Inc., 548 P.2d 246 (Haw. 1976). · cites it 3× “The prepayment requirement in § 237-42, supra, appears on its face to apply only to the types of appeals provided for in HRS § 235-114, i.e., appeals to the Tax Appeal Court and the district boards of review.”
In re the Tax Appeal of Trade Wind Tours of Hawaii, Inc., 718 P.2d 1122 (Haw. App. 1986). · cites it 3× “HRS § 232-13 (1976) specifies that“[t]he hearing before the tax appeal court shall be a hearing de novo[,]” wherein “[e]ach party shall have the right to introduce .”
In re the Tax Appeal of Otis Elevator Co., 566 P.2d 1091 (Haw. 1977). · cites it 2× “…shown under the column “as returned” in the notices of assessment dated October 9, 1971. HRS § 40-35; HRS § 238-8; HRS § 235-114 (Supp. 1975). HRS § 238-2(3) states: §238-2 Imposition of tax; exemptions. There is hereby levied an excise tax on the use in this State of…”
In Re the Tax Appeal of Aloha Motors, Inc., 750 P.2d 81 (Haw. 1988). “If any person having made the return and paid the tax as provided by this chapter feels aggrieved by the assessment so made upon the person by the director of taxation, the person may, provided the tax so assessed shall have been paid, appeal the assessment in the manner and…”
In re: Tax Appeal of Mikami v. Dir. of Taxation (Haw. App. 2026). · cites it 16× “Pursuant to HRS § 235-114 (2017), the Mikamis had the opportunity to present their case to the Tax Court, provided they file their notice of appeal within thirty days from the mailing of the Notices.”
In re: Tax Appeal of PM & AM Rsch., Inc. v. State (Haw. App. 2025). · cites it 7× “]" (e) HRS § 235-114(a), which applies to appeals of general excise tax assessments, HRS § 237-42 (2017), states: Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter…”
In re: Tax Appeal of Whale Watchers, LLC v. State (Haw. App. 2025). · cites it 7× “]" (e) HRS § 235-114(a), which applies to appeals of general excise tax assessments, HRS § 237-42 (2017), states: Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter…”
In re: Tax Appeal of PM & AM Rsch., Inc. v. State (Haw. App. 2025). · cites it 7× “]" (e) HRS § 235-114(a), which applies to appeals of general excise tax assessments, HRS § 237-42 (2017), states: Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter…”
In re: Tax Appeal of Big Island Sci. Ctr., LLC v. State (Haw. App. 2025). · cites it 7× “]" (e) HRS § 235-114(a), which applies to appeals of general excise tax assessments, HRS § 237-42 (2017), states: Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 235-114(2001) — 1 case
Kinkaid v. Bd. of Review of the City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 104 P.3d 905 (Haw. 2004). “, HRS § 235-114 (2001) (income tax assessments); id.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 235-114(a) — 5 cases
In re: Tax Appeal of PM & AM Rsch., Inc. v. State (Haw. App. 2025). “]" (e) HRS § 235-114(a), which applies to appeals of general excise tax assessments, HRS § 237-42 (2017), states: Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter…”
In re: Tax Appeal of Whale Watchers, LLC v. State (Haw. App. 2025). “]" (e) HRS § 235-114(a), which applies to appeals of general excise tax assessments, HRS § 237-42 (2017), states: Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter…”
In re: Tax Appeal of PM & AM Rsch., Inc. v. State (Haw. App. 2025). “]" (e) HRS § 235-114(a), which applies to appeals of general excise tax assessments, HRS § 237-42 (2017), states: Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter…”
In re: Tax Appeal of Big Island Sci. Ctr., LLC v. State (Haw. App. 2025). “]" (e) HRS § 235-114(a), which applies to appeals of general excise tax assessments, HRS § 237-42 (2017), states: Any person aggrieved by any assessment of the tax or liability imposed by this chapter may appeal from the assessment in the manner and within the time hereinafter…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 235-114(c) — 2 cases
In re: Tax Appeal of Mikami v. Dir. of Taxation (Haw. App. 2026). “Pursuant to HRS § 235-114 (2017), the Mikamis had the opportunity to present their case to the Tax Court, provided they file their notice of appeal within thirty days from the mailing of the Notices.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.