Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 237-6 (2026)

  "Contractor", "contracting", "federal cost-plus contractor", defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §237-6  "Contractor", "contracting", "federal cost-plus contractor", defined.  "Contracting" means the business activities of a contractor.

     "Contractor" includes, for purposes of this chapter:

     (1)  Every person engaging in the business of contracting to erect, construct, repair, or improve buildings or structures, of any kind or description, including any portion thereof, or to make any installation therein, or to make, construct, repair, or improve any highway, road, street, sidewalk, ditch, excavation, fill, bridge, shaft, well, culvert, sewer, water system, drainage system, dredging or harbor improvement project, electric or steam rail, lighting or power system, transmission line, tower, dock, wharf, or other improvements;

     (2)  Every person engaging in the practice of architecture, professional engineering, land surveying, and landscape architecture, as defined in section 464-1; and

     (3)  Every person engaged in the practice of pest control or fumigation as a pest control operator as defined in section 460J-1.

     "Federal cost-plus contractor" means a contractor having a contract with the United States or an instrumentality thereof, excluding national banks, where, by the terms of the contract, the United States or such instrumentality, excluding national banks, agrees to reimburse the contractor for the cost of material, plant, or equipment used in the performance of the contract and for taxes which the contractor may be required to pay with respect to such material, plant, or equipment, whether the contractor's profit is computed in the form of a fixed fee or on a percentage basis; and also means a subcontractor under such a contract, who also operates on a cost-plus basis. [L 1935, c 141, pt of §1; am L 1941, c 265, §1(b); am L 1943, c 81, §1(a); RL 1945, §5448; RL 1955, §117-7; am L 1965, c 201, §36; HRS §237-6; am L 1971, c 4, §1 and c 204, §3; am L 1984, c 60, §1; am L 2000, c 198, §2]

 

Case Notes

 

  "Structures" does not include boats and vessels, and taxpayer engaged in repair of marine vessels is not a "contractor".  55 H. 572, 524 P.2d 890 (1974).

  Cited:  44 H. 584, 587, 358 P.2d 539 (1961).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1968–1977 · leading case: In Re the Tax Appeal of Pac. Marine & Supply Co..
In Re the Tax Appeal of Pac. Marine & Supply Co. (Haw. 1974). · cites it 39× “The decision of the Tax Appeal Court was that *575 taxpayer was not a “contractor” under HRS § 237-6 1 as this statute read prior to June 28,1965, i.”
In re the Tax Appeal of Otis Elevator Co. (Haw. 1977). · cites it 3× “HRS § 237-6 (Supp. 1975) defines “contractor” as follows: §237-6 “Contractor”, “federal cost-plus contractor”, defined.”
City Collectors, Ltd. v. Maldonado (Haw. 1968). “” Section 237-6 provides: “The provisions of Section 237-5 shall extend to successive persons and to the Territory or any political or municipal subdivision thereof, other than the original garnishee, employing the judgment debtor, until the judgment debt has been fully…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 237-6(1) — 1 case
In Re the Tax Appeal of Pac. Marine & Supply Co. (Haw. 1974). “The decision of the Tax Appeal Court was that *575 taxpayer was not a “contractor” under HRS § 237-6 1 as this statute read prior to June 28,1965, i.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 237-6(2) — 1 case
In Re the Tax Appeal of Pac. Marine & Supply Co. (Haw. 1974). “The decision of the Tax Appeal Court was that *575 taxpayer was not a “contractor” under HRS § 237-6 1 as this statute read prior to June 28,1965, i.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.