PART III.
STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM
§264-41 Establishment. There is
established a state highway system which shall consist of federal-aid highways
and other public highways which may be designated for inclusion in the system
pursuant to section 264-42. [L 1965, c 159, pt of §1; Supp, §111-51; HRS
§264-41]
Case Notes
A public highway is not a state highway unless it is
designated for inclusion in the state highway system. 2 H. App. 387, 633 P.2d
1118 (1981).
Notes of Decisions
Wemple ex rel. Dang v. Dahman, 72 P.3d 499 (Haw. App. 2002).
· cites it 2× “However, the roadway does not become a county highway unless and until it is accepted by the legislative body.”
Maui Ranch Estates Owners Ass'n v. Cnty. of Maui, 724 P.2d 118 (Haw. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “A public highway is not a state highway unless it is designated for inclusion in the State Highway System under HRS § 264-41 (1976). All public highways which are not state highways are county highways or they are not public highways.”
Santos v. Perreira, 633 P.2d 1118 (Haw. App. 1981).
· cites it 2× “A public highway is not a state highway unless it is designated for inclusion in the State Highway System under HRS § 264-41 (1976). All public highways which are not state highways are county highways or they are not public highways.”
Burke v. Kakaako Land Co., 562 P.3d 177 (Haw. App. 2025).
· cites it 6× “We stated that the facts in the record did not support Santos's argument: A public highway is not a state highway unless it is designated for inclusion in the State Highway System under HRS § 264-41 (1976). . . . There is no evidence in the record of the designation, acceptance,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.