Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 269
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 269-5 (2025)

  Annual report and register of orders

✓ laws through the 2025 session: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §269-5  Annual report and register of orders.  The public utilities commission shall prepare and present to the governor in the month of January in each year a report respecting its actions during the preceding fiscal year.  This report shall include summary information and analytical, comparative, and trend data concerning major regulatory issues acted upon and pending before the commission; cases processed by the commission, including their dispositions; utility company operations, capital improvements, and rates; utility company performance in terms of efficiency and quality of services rendered; financing orders issued, adjustments made to the public benefits fee, and repayments or credits provided to electric utility customers pursuant to part X or chapter 196, part IV; a summary of power purchase agreements, including pricing, in effect during the fiscal year; environmental matters having a significant impact upon public utilities; actions of the federal government affecting the regulation of public utilities in Hawaii; long and short-range plans and objectives of the commission; together with the commission's recommendations respecting legislation and other matters requiring executive and legislative consideration.  Electronic copies of the annual reports shall be furnished by the governor to the legislature.  In addition, the commission shall establish and maintain a register of all its orders and decisions, which shall be open and readily available for public inspection, and no order or decision of the commission shall take effect until it is filed and recorded in this register. [L 1913, c 89, §3; RL 1925, §2191; RL 1935, §7943; RL 1945, §4704; RL 1955, §104-4; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §6; am L 1963, c 114, §3; HRS §269-5; am L 1976, c 165, §4; am L 2013, c 211, §4 and c 260, §2; am L 2014, c 108, §6; am L 2021, c 72, §1]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1958–2000 · leading case: Ariyoshi v. Hawaii Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 704 P.2d 917 (Haw. App. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ariyoshi v. Hawaii Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 704 P.2d 917 (Haw. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “See HRS § 269-5 l(Supp. 1984). 9 It may be argued that the case at bar is distinguishable from Hawaiian Electric, because in the latter case the supreme court pointed out that the PUC staff had not appealed and, therefore, the public interest in the outcome of the case would not…”
Tugaeff ex rel. Tugaeff v. Tugaeff, 42 Haw. 455 (1958). · cites it 2× “1955, § 269-5) A proceeding for civil contempt has as its object the enforcement of an order made for the benefit of a private *460 party.”
LeMay v. Leander, 994 P.2d 546 (Haw. 2000). “2d at 635 (noting that Revised Laws of Hawai'i § 269-5 (1955), required that the circumstances of contempt be set forth in the judgment and mittimus).”
Crow v. Crow, 414 P.2d 82 (Haw. 1966). “Turning to the question of contempt, section 269-5, R.L.H. 1955, provides: “* * * Whenever any person is adjudged guilty of any contempt or sentenced therefor, the particular circumstances of the offense shall be fully set forth in the judgment * * In adjudging appellant guilty…”
Re Habeas Corpus, Balucan, 353 P.2d 631 (Haw. 1960). · cites it 4× “1955, § 269-5, provides in part: "Whenever any person is adjudged guilty of any contempt or sentenced therefor, the particular circumstances of the offense shall be fully set forth in the judgment and in the order or warrant of commitment * * *.”
In re Balucan, 353 P.2d 631 (Haw. 1960). · cites it 4× “1955, § 269-5, provides in part: “Whenever any person is adjudged guilty of any contempt or sentenced therefor, the particular circumstances of the offense shall be fully set forth in the judgment and in the order or warrant of commitment * * Under this provision there must be a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.