Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 271
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 271-2 (2026)

  Administration; governing provisions of other acts

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §271-2  Administration; governing provisions of other acts. This chapter shall be administered by the public utilities commission of the State and the provisions of this chapter and of chapter 269, not inconsistent with this chapter, shall govern its administration; provided that sections 269-4, 269-9, 269-11, 269-16 to 269-28 and 269-30 shall not, in any respect, apply to the regulation of motor carriers. [L 1961, c 121, pt of §§2, 3; Supp, §106C-2; am L 1967, c 218, §1; HRS §271-2]

 

Note

 

  Sections 269-4 and 269-11 referred to in text are repealed.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1997–2010 · leading case: In Re Peterson v. Hawaii Elec. Light Co., 944 P.2d 1265 (Haw. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Peterson v. Hawaii Elec. Light Co., 944 P.2d 1265 (Haw. 1997). · cites it 4× “See HRS §§ 271-2 and 271G-3. Under HRS ch. 271, a direct appeal is authorized by HRS §§ 271-32(e) and 271-33.”
In Re Robert's Tours & Transp., Inc., 85 P.3d 623 (Haw. 2004). · cites it 2× “HRS § 271-2 (1993). Within HRS Chapter 271, there are two relevant statutory provisions governing appeals: HRS § 271-32(e) (1993) 3 and HRS § 271-33 (1993).”
In Re Brandon, 149 P.3d 806 (Haw. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “HRS Chapter 271, the Motor Carrie]' Law, regulates the commercial transportation of people and property.”
Jack's Tours, Inc. v. Kilauea Military Camp, 145 P.3d 693 (Haw. 2006). · cites it 2× “HRS § 271-2 (1993) provides that "[t]his chapter[, i.”
In re Aloha Island Enter. LLC (Haw. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “With respect to appeals from Appellee PUC's orders, the Hawafi legislature has provided otherwise: HRS Chapter 271, the Motor Carrier Law, regulates the commercial transportation of people and property.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.