Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 286
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 286-151 (2026)

to 286-163  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART VII.  ALCOHOL, DRUGS, AND HIGHWAY SAFETY--REPEALED

 

     §§286-151 to 286-163  REPEALED.  L 2000, c 189, §28.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases, 1975–2018 · leading case: State v. Entrekin, 47 P.3d 336 (Haw. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Entrekin, 47 P.3d 336 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 30× “See HRS § 286-151 (Supp. 2000). 2 The statutory scheme, however, also permits drivers to withdraw them consent, see HRS § 286-151.”
State v. Garcia, 29 P.3d 919 (Haw. 2001). · cites it 16× “Further, the legislature did not amend HRS § 286-151, the implied consent statute.”
State v. Wilson, 987 P.2d 268 (Haw. 1999). · cites it 18× “HRS § 286-151 likewise requires that "the test or tests shall be administered .”
Castro v. Admin. Dir. of the Courts, 40 P.3d 865 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 16× “The statute at issue in Wilson , HRS § 286-151, is also the statute at issue in the case sub judice.”
State v. Anger, 98 P.3d 630 (Haw. 2004). · cites it 16× “, Anger contends that the district court erred: (1) in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test because (a) the relevant testimony of Maui Police Department (MPD) Officer Rockwell Silva that Anger sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident constituted…”
Rossell v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 579 P.2d 663 (Haw. 1978). · cites it 9× “Pursuant to HRS § 286-151 (1976 Repl.), appellee was informed of the possibility of revocation of his driver’s license if he refused to submit to either a breath or blood test for purposes of determining the alcoholic content of his blood.”
State v. Tengan, 691 P.2d 365 (Haw. 1984). · cites it 9× “6 Though modified, the essence of these provisions is retained in the calculus of laws dealing with the menacing presence of the intoxicated driver *457 on the highways of the State, see HRS §§ 286-151 and 286-155, and “implied consent” to testing remains the linchpin of the…”
In the Interest of Doe, 30 P.3d 231 (Haw. 2001). · cites it 14× “) [6] Effective January 1, 2002, HRS §§ 286-151 to -163 and HRS §§ 286-251 to -266 will be repealed and replaced by a new HRS chapter, that will be entitled "Use of Intoxicants while Operating a Vehicle.”
State v. Moore, 614 P.2d 931 (Haw. 1980). · cites it 6× “This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court revoking defendant Moore’s driving license for six months, pursuant to HRS §§ 286-151 and 286-155, 1 upon defendant’s *303 refusal to submit to chemical testing for alcohol.”
Gray v. Admin. Dir. of Court, 931 P.2d 580 (Haw. 1997). · cites it 2× “See HRS § 286-151(a) (Supp.1990) (deeming any operator of a motor vehicle on public highways to have consented to test "of the person's breath or blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of the person's blood”); see also HRS § 286—258(c)(2), supra at note 6.”
State v. Rodgers, 53 P.3d 209 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 6× “Effective January 1, 2002, HRS §§ 286-151 through 286-163 were repealed and recodified in HRS chapter 291E.”
State v. Ferrer, 23 P.3d 744 (Haw. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “At the time Defendant was arrested, the Ha-wai'i Implied Consent Law for non-commercial drivers of motor vehicles or mopeds was HRS § 286-151 (Supp.1998), which provided as follows: Implied consent of driver of motor vehicle or moped to submit to testing to determine alcohol…”
Show all 23 citing cases →
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 286-151(a) — 5 cases
State v. Wilson, 987 P.2d 268 (Haw. 1999). “HRS § 286-151 likewise requires that "the test or tests shall be administered .”
Gray v. Admin. Dir. of Court, 931 P.2d 580 (Haw. 1997). “See HRS § 286-151(a) (Supp.1990) (deeming any operator of a motor vehicle on public highways to have consented to test "of the person's breath or blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of the person's blood”); see also HRS § 286—258(c)(2), supra at note 6.”
In the Interest of Doe, 30 P.3d 231 (Haw. 2001). “) [6] Effective January 1, 2002, HRS §§ 286-151 to -163 and HRS §§ 286-251 to -266 will be repealed and replaced by a new HRS chapter, that will be entitled "Use of Intoxicants while Operating a Vehicle.”
State v. Rodgers, 53 P.3d 209 (Haw. 2002). “Effective January 1, 2002, HRS §§ 286-151 through 286-163 were repealed and recodified in HRS chapter 291E.”
State v. Marshall, 163 P.3d 199 (Haw. App. 2007).
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 286-151(b) — 2 cases
State v. Garcia, 29 P.3d 919 (Haw. 2001). “Further, the legislature did not amend HRS § 286-151, the implied consent statute.”
State v. Wilson, 987 P.2d 268 (Haw. 1999). “HRS § 286-151 likewise requires that "the test or tests shall be administered .”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 286-151(b)(1) — 1 case
State v. Entrekin, 47 P.3d 336 (Haw. 2002). “See HRS § 286-151 (Supp. 2000). 2 The statutory scheme, however, also permits drivers to withdraw them consent, see HRS § 286-151.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.