Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 291
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 291-10 (2026)

  Penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §291-10  Penalty.  Any person violating any of the provisions of sections 291-8 and 291-9 shall be fined not less than $5 nor more than $150. [L 1917, c 69, §3; RL 1925, §4408; RL 1935, §6298; RL 1945, §11711; RL 1955, §311-17; HRS §291-10]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1958–1998 · leading case: State v. Bunn, 440 P.2d 528 (Haw. 1968).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Bunn, 440 P.2d 528 (Haw. 1968). · cites it 86× “1955, § 291-10. The complaint contained two counts, one for causing the death of Benny and the other for causing the death of his wife.”
Pac. Int'l Servs. Corp v. Hurip, 873 P.2d 88 (Haw. 1994). · cites it 2× “The Financial Responsibility Law Does Not Conflict With HRS § 291-10 On The Basis That It Is Contradictory Or Inimical Thereto.”
State v. Tamanaha, 377 P.2d 688 (Haw. 1962). · cites it 2× “1955, § 291-10) reads: " Negligent homicide; penalty.”
State v. Tabigne, 966 P.2d 608 (Haw. 1998). “§ 291-10 (1955), which provided that “[ejvery person who by the operation of any vehicle in a careless, reckless or negligent manner, but not wilfully or wantonly, causes the death of another, shall be guilty of the crime of negligent homicide.”
Territory of Hawaii v. Henry, 43 Haw. 54 (Haw. 1958). · cites it 3× “1955, § 291-10, in the following words: "The Grand Jury of the Third Circuit of the Territory of Hawaii does present that LORRIN K.”
State v. Arena, 379 P.2d 594 (Haw. 1963). · cites it 3× “1955, § 291-10, 1 under an indictment charging, in material part, that: “On or about the 22nd day of December, 1960, in the City and County of Honolulu, State of Hawaii, EUGENE ROY ARENA, while operating a Chevrolet automobile, * * * in the Ewa direction on Kala *317 nianaole…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.