Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 334
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-51 (2026)

to 334-58 [OLD] REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §§334-51 to 334-58 [OLD] REPEALED.  L 1976, c 130, pt of §4.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1976–2003 · leading case: Suzuki v. Quisenberry, 411 F. Supp. 1113 (D. Haw. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Suzuki v. Quisenberry, 411 F. Supp. 1113 (D. Haw. 1976). · cites it 7× “§ 334-51. The operative provisions of law are H.”
In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003). · cites it 6× “Under Act 259, which was codified as HRS chapter 334 (1968), initial admission of a mentally ill individual to a licensed psychiatric facility was effectuated solely by the administrator of the psychiatric facility or the administrator's deputy, upon the certificates of two…”
Suzuki v. Alba, 438 F. Supp. 1106 (D. Haw. 1977). · cites it 2× “§§ 334-51(a)(2), 334-53, 334-71, and 334-73(b) [hereinafter Subclass A] or (b) under H.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-51(a)(2) — 3 cases
Suzuki v. Quisenberry, 411 F. Supp. 1113 (D. Haw. 1976). “§ 334-51. The operative provisions of law are H.”
In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003). “Under Act 259, which was codified as HRS chapter 334 (1968), initial admission of a mentally ill individual to a licensed psychiatric facility was effectuated solely by the administrator of the psychiatric facility or the administrator's deputy, upon the certificates of two…”
Suzuki v. Alba, 438 F. Supp. 1106 (D. Haw. 1977). “§§ 334-51(a)(2), 334-53, 334-71, and 334-73(b) [hereinafter Subclass A] or (b) under H.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-51(a)(3) — 2 cases
Suzuki v. Quisenberry, 411 F. Supp. 1113 (D. Haw. 1976). “§ 334-51. The operative provisions of law are H.”
Suzuki v. Alba, 438 F. Supp. 1106 (D. Haw. 1977). “§§ 334-51(a)(2), 334-53, 334-71, and 334-73(b) [hereinafter Subclass A] or (b) under H.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.