Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60 (2026)

REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§334-60 REPEALED. L 1984, c 188, §2.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1978–2019 · leading case: In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003). · cites it 34× “In 1984, the legislature repealed HRS § 334-60 and enacted a new statutory provision, codified in 1985 as HRS § 334-60.”

State v. Raitz, 621 P.2d 352 (Haw. 1980). · cites it 8× “He further argues § 704-406 also denies him equal protection of the laws because of the lack of a provision for court review after an initial ninety-day period of confinement like that in the statutory provi *71 sions governing non-consensual civil commitments of mentally…”

Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979). “” 5 Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60 (b) (4) (I) (Supp.”

Parham v. J. R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979). “2 (1978); Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60 (a) (2) (1976) (only for child less than 15); Idaho Code §§ 66-318 , 66-320 (Supp.”

In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Luciano G., 450 P.3d 1258 (Alaska 2019). “22 Luciano’s behavior was concededly unusual, and it is understandable that his behavior would be cause for concern to those who interacted with him.”

Namauu v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 614 P.2d 943 (Haw. 1980). · cites it 2× “, now HRS § 334-60(b)(l) (1976) which requires for involuntary hospitalization, a judicial determination of dangerousness to self or others or to property.”

Thompson v. Yuen, 623 P.2d 881 (Haw. 1981). · cites it 4× “Civil commitment under HRS § 334-60(b)(4)(I) requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt while commitment subsequent to an insanity acquittal requires a preponderance of the evidence.”

In Re Kossow, 393 A.2d 97 (D.C. 1978). “1975); Haw.Rev.Stat. § 334-60(b)(4)(E) (Supp.1977); Neb.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60(b) — 1 case

In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003). “In 1984, the legislature repealed HRS § 334-60 and enacted a new statutory provision, codified in 1985 as HRS § 334-60.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60(b)(1)(B) — 1 case

In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003). “In 1984, the legislature repealed HRS § 334-60 and enacted a new statutory provision, codified in 1985 as HRS § 334-60.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60(b)(4)(E) — 1 case

In Re Kossow, 393 A.2d 97 (D.C. 1978). “1975); Haw.Rev.Stat. § 334-60(b)(4)(E) (Supp.1977); Neb.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60(b)(4)(G) — 1 case

In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003). “In 1984, the legislature repealed HRS § 334-60 and enacted a new statutory provision, codified in 1985 as HRS § 334-60.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60(b)(4)(I) — 1 case

Thompson v. Yuen, 623 P.2d 881 (Haw. 1981). “Civil commitment under HRS § 334-60(b)(4)(I) requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt while commitment subsequent to an insanity acquittal requires a preponderance of the evidence.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60(b)(l) — 1 case

Namauu v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 614 P.2d 943 (Haw. 1980). “, now HRS § 334-60(b)(l) (1976) which requires for involuntary hospitalization, a judicial determination of dangerousness to self or others or to property.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-60(b)(l)(B) — 1 case

In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003). “In 1984, the legislature repealed HRS § 334-60 and enacted a new statutory provision, codified in 1985 as HRS § 334-60.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.