Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 353
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 353-18 (2026)

  Director to fix committed persons' compensation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §353-18  Director to fix committed persons' compensation.  The director, by rule, may classify, grade, and fix earnings to be paid to committed persons who may be confined in any correctional facility of the State. [L 1987, c 338, pt of §3]

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1973–2015 · leading case: Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (1983). · cites it 2× “, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 353-18 (1976), or another State's prison, e.”
Tai v. Chang, 570 P.2d 563 (Haw. 1977). · cites it 5× “The lower court dismissed appellant’s petition, holding that the Hawaii Administrative Procedure Act 3 (hereinafter cited as HAP A) was *387 inapplicable to his case and that the governor had approved his transfer as required by HRS § 353-18. We affirm. Appellant’s Prison…”
Park v. Thompson, 356 F. Supp. 783 (D. Haw. 1973). · cites it 4× “The transfer of a state prisoner to a federal prison is effected pursuant to HRS § 353-18 and an agreement between the state of Hawaii and the United States Department of Justice.”
Tai v. Thompson, 396 F. Supp. 196 (D. Haw. 1975). · cites it 8× “4 The relief sought was an order returning him to Hawaii pending the outcome of any hearing as to his “suitability for further transfer”, money damages, costs and attorney’s fees.”
Tai v. Thompson, 387 F. Supp. 912 (D. Haw. 1975). · cites it 2× “§ 353-18 and 18 U.S.C. § 5003 and an agreement between the state and the federal government.”
Wakinekona v. Olim, 459 F. Supp. 473 (D. Haw. 1978). “Section 353-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes provides: The director of social services shall, with the approval of the governor, effect the transfer of a state prisoner to any federal correctional institution for imprisonment, subsistence, care, and proper employment of such…”
the Texas Educ. Agency & Mike Morath, Comm'r of Educ., in His Off. Capacity v. Academy of Careers & Tech., Inc. D/B/A Academy of Careers & Tech. Charter Sch. (Tex. App. 2015). “, retained “discretion to transfer [the prisoner] for whatever Haw.Rev.Stat. § 353-18 (1976), or another State’s prison, reason or for no reason at all,” ibid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.