PART I.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
§368-1 Purpose and intent. The
legislature finds and declares that the practice of discrimination because of
race, color, religion, age, sex, including gender identity or expression,
sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, place of birth, ancestry,
or disability in employment, housing, public accommodations, or access to
services receiving state financial assistance is against public policy. It is
the purpose of this chapter to provide a mechanism that provides for a uniform
procedure for the enforcement of the State's discrimination laws. It is the
legislature's intent to preserve all existing rights and remedies under such
laws. [L 1988, c 219, pt of §1; am L 1989, c 387, §1; am L 1991, c 2, §1; am L
1992, c 33, §5; am L 2011, c 34, §2; am L 2025, c 259, §3]
Case Notes
Cited: 133 H. 332, 328 P.3d 341 (2014).
Notes of Decisions
Lales v. Wholesale Motors Co.., 328 P.3d 341 (Haw. 2014).
· cites it 31× “Laws Act 219, § 1 at 387 (emphasis added); HRS § 368-1. To effectuate this intent, the legislature created the HCRC.”
SCI Mgmt. Corp. v. Sims, 71 P.3d 389 (Haw. 2003).
· cites it 20× “" HRS § 368-1 (1993). The HCRC has "jurisdiction over the subject of discriminatory practices made unlawful by chapters 489, 515, part I of chapter 378, and .”
Cervelli v. Aloha Bed & Breakfast, 415 P.3d 919 (Haw. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “Assuming, without deciding, that Aloha B&B established a prima facie case of substantial burden to Young's exercise of religion, we conclude that the application of HRS Chapter 489 to Aloha B&B's conduct in this case satisfies the strict scrutiny standard. As previously…”
Sevcik v. Unlimited Constr. Servs., Inc., 462 F. Supp. 2d 1140 (D. Haw. 2006).
“§ 368-1, et seq. Some of the potential remedies include an "apprenticeship training program, on-the-job training program, or other occupational training or retraining program.”
Hawai'i Tech. Academy v. LE. (Haw. 2017).
· cites it 12× “” The Executive Director opined, however, that because publicly funded educational institutions are not “public accommodations,” the 15 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** HCRC lacked jurisdiction under HRS § 368-1 (Supp. 2011).9 The Academy…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.