Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 386-93 (2026)

  Costs

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §386-93  Costs.  (a)  If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board, or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been brought, prosecuted, or defended without reasonable ground, the whole costs of the proceedings including reasonable attorney's fees may be assessed against the party who has brought, prosecuted, or defended the proceedings.

     (b)  If an employer appeals a decision of the director or appellate board, the costs of the proceedings of the appellate board or the appellate court, together with reasonable attorney's fees, shall be assessed against the employer if the employer loses; provided that if an employer or an insurance carrier, other than the employer who appealed, is held liable for compensation, the costs of the proceedings of the appellate board or the appellate court, together with reasonable attorney's fees, shall be assessed against the party held liable for the compensation. [L 1963, c 116, pt of §1; Supp, §97-102; am L 1967, c 180, §1; HRS §386-93; am L 1969, c 244, §2g; am L 2004, c 202, §45; am L 2006, c 94, §1; am L 2010, c 109, §1; am L 2012, c 234, §1]

 

Rules of Court

 

  See HRCP rule 54(d).

 

Law Journals and Reviews

 

  One-Sided Bargain?  Assessing the Fairness of Hawai‘i's Workers' Compensation Law.  31 UH L. Rev. 553 (2009).

 

Case Notes

 

  Attorney fees.  35 H. 591 (1940).

  Reasonable grounds.  38 H. 405 (1949).

  Party who prevailed on the crucial issue held to be the prevailing party.  57 H. 535, 560 P.2d 1292 (1977).

  Imposes liability for costs and fees incurred by nonappealing employer on appealing employer who loses.  66 H. 290, 660 P.2d 1316 (1983).

  An order regarding the award or denial of attorney's fees and costs with respect to subsection (b) is a final order under §91-14(a) for purposes of appeal; this final order rule applies prospectively to prevent injustice; subsection (b) allows assessment of attorney's fees and costs against an employer if the employer loses the final appeal.  104 H. 164, 86 P.3d 973 (2004).

  Where appeals court's opinion regarding attorney's fees and costs under this section was not ripe for decision, constituted an advisory opinion akin to the issuance of an opinion when there was no subject matter jurisdiction, and constituted inappropriate judicial interference with an administrative decision of an entity within a separate, co-equal branch that had not been formalized and had not yet affected the challenging parties in a concrete way, thereby implicating separation-of-powers concerns, the appeals court's exercise of appellate power constituted error.  121 H. 33, 211 P.3d 750 (2009).

  Employee was entitled to award of costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred in defending against a point of appeal that employer, who did not file its own appeal, was permitted to raise at a pretrial conference and ultimately lost during employee's appeal.  136 H. 483 (App.), 363 P.3d 331 (2015).

  Imposes liability for costs and fees incurred by nonappealing employer on appealing employer who loses; "crucial issue" test applied.  5 H. App. 521, 704 P.2d 914 (1985).

  When employer appeals decision of director or appeals board and subsequently withdraws either entire appeal or any portion of appeal, or concedes, the decision of director or appeals board becomes final and employer is considered losing party for purposes of subsection (b).  84 H. 390 (App.), 935 P.2d 105 (1997).

  Cited:  33 H. 634 (1935).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 211 P.3d 750 (Haw. 2009).
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 211 P.3d 750 (Haw. 2009). · cites it 125× “Based upon its remand of the case to the LIRAB, the ICA recognized that it could not decide the attorney's fees issue but, nevertheless, provided "guidance" to the LIRAB regarding the application of HRS § 386-93(b) on remand. On application, the City essentially contends that…”
Lindinha v. Hilo Coast Processing Co., 86 P.3d 973 (Haw. 2004). · cites it 51× “We hold that (1) an order regarding the award or denial of attorney’s fees and costs with respect to Hawai'i Revised Statutes *165 (HRS) § 386-93(b) (1993) 1 is a final order under HRS § 91-14(a) (1993) for purposes of appeal, (2) this final order rule applies prospectively to…”
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 196 P.3d 306 (Haw. App. 2008). · cites it 46× “HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp.2007) governs the award of attorney’s fees and costs in workers’ compensation cases and provides as follows: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board [2] or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been…”
Survivors of Iida v. Oriental Imports, Inc., 935 P.2d 105 (Haw. App. 1997). · cites it 26× “Unlike HRS § 386-93(a), 14 which allows costs to be taxed against any party for frivolous appeals, HRS § 386-93(b) places the burden solely on the employer if the employer loses, regardless of the meritorious nature of the appeal.”
Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co., 660 P.2d 1316 (Haw. 1983). · cites it 8× “Maui Pine’s second point on appeal necessitates a determination as to the proper application of HRS § 386-93. Initially, we note that Hawaii allows attorney’s fees only when authorized by statute, rule of court, agreement, stipulation, or Hawaiian precedent.”
Yamada v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Co., 704 P.2d 914 (Haw. App. 1985). · cites it 17× “time in 1975 for which Appellees must pay him compensation; (3) Yamada’s 1974 and 1975 injury combined with his pre-1974 “ratable permanent disability” resulted in his permanent total disability effective September 17, 1975; and (4) the work injury for which Brewer is…”
Mitchell v. BWK Jt. Venture, 560 P.2d 1292 (Haw. 1977). · cites it 2× “HRS § 386-93(b) (1975 Supp.) provides in pertinent part as follows: (b) If an employer appeals a decision of the director or appellate board, the costs of the proceedings of the appellate board or the supreme court of the State, together with reasonable attorney’s fees shall be…”
City of Louisville v. Slack, 39 S.W.3d 809 (Ky. 2001). · cites it 2× “19, § 2350(f) (2000); Haw.Rev.Stat. § 386-93 (2000). The Florida statute provides, "If any proceedings are had for review of any claim, award, or compensation order before any court, the court may award the injured employee or dependent an attorney's fee to be paid by the…”
Irving v. Ocean House Builders, 363 P.3d 331 (Haw. App. 2015). · cites it 37× “urposes of awarding attorney fees pursuant to HRS § 386-93(b), Employer “effectively appealed” the Director’s decision that Irving sustained work-related injuries on October 25, 2010 by seeking LIRAB’s review of this issue at the pretrial conference; (2) he was the prevailing…”
Kelly v. Metal-weld Specialties, Inc., 192 P.3d 613 (Haw. App. 2008). · cites it 22× “HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp. 2007) provides: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been brought, prosecuted, or defended without reasonable ground the whole costs of the proceedings may be…”
Botelho v. Atlas Recycling Ctr., LLC. (Haw. 2020). · cites it 9× “DCD also “assessed attorney’s fees and costs” against Atlas/HEMIC pursuant to HRS § 386-93(a) 4 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** (Supp.”
Costa, JR. v. Cnty. of Hawaii, 154 Haw. 40 (Haw. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “] 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER independent psychiatric examination (IPE) and the subsequent IPE report's legal significance; and (7) considering Costa's available remedy under HRS § 386-93(a) (2015) in its Decision and Order.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 386-93(a) — 11 cases
Survivors of Iida v. Oriental Imports, Inc., 935 P.2d 105 (Haw. App. 1997). “Unlike HRS § 386-93(a), 14 which allows costs to be taxed against any party for frivolous appeals, HRS § 386-93(b) places the burden solely on the employer if the employer loses, regardless of the meritorious nature of the appeal.”
Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co., 660 P.2d 1316 (Haw. 1983). “Maui Pine’s second point on appeal necessitates a determination as to the proper application of HRS § 386-93. Initially, we note that Hawaii allows attorney’s fees only when authorized by statute, rule of court, agreement, stipulation, or Hawaiian precedent.”
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 196 P.3d 306 (Haw. App. 2008). “HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp.2007) governs the award of attorney’s fees and costs in workers’ compensation cases and provides as follows: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board [2] or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been…”
Kelly v. Metal-weld Specialties, Inc., 192 P.3d 613 (Haw. App. 2008). “HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp. 2007) provides: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been brought, prosecuted, or defended without reasonable ground the whole costs of the proceedings may be…”
Botelho v. Atlas Recycling Ctr., LLC. (Haw. 2020). “DCD also “assessed attorney’s fees and costs” against Atlas/HEMIC pursuant to HRS § 386-93(a) 4 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** (Supp.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 386-93(b) — 9 cases
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 211 P.3d 750 (Haw. 2009). “Based upon its remand of the case to the LIRAB, the ICA recognized that it could not decide the attorney's fees issue but, nevertheless, provided "guidance" to the LIRAB regarding the application of HRS § 386-93(b) on remand. On application, the City essentially contends that…”
Lindinha v. Hilo Coast Processing Co., 86 P.3d 973 (Haw. 2004). “We hold that (1) an order regarding the award or denial of attorney’s fees and costs with respect to Hawai'i Revised Statutes *165 (HRS) § 386-93(b) (1993) 1 is a final order under HRS § 91-14(a) (1993) for purposes of appeal, (2) this final order rule applies prospectively to…”
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 196 P.3d 306 (Haw. App. 2008). “HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp.2007) governs the award of attorney’s fees and costs in workers’ compensation cases and provides as follows: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board [2] or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been…”
Survivors of Iida v. Oriental Imports, Inc., 935 P.2d 105 (Haw. App. 1997). “Unlike HRS § 386-93(a), 14 which allows costs to be taxed against any party for frivolous appeals, HRS § 386-93(b) places the burden solely on the employer if the employer loses, regardless of the meritorious nature of the appeal.”
Yamada v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Co., 704 P.2d 914 (Haw. App. 1985). “time in 1975 for which Appellees must pay him compensation; (3) Yamada’s 1974 and 1975 injury combined with his pre-1974 “ratable permanent disability” resulted in his permanent total disability effective September 17, 1975; and (4) the work injury for which Brewer is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.