§386-93 Costs. (a) If the director of
labor and industrial relations, appellate board, or any court finds that
proceedings under this chapter have been brought, prosecuted, or defended
without reasonable ground, the whole costs of the proceedings including
reasonable attorney's fees may be assessed against the party who has brought,
prosecuted, or defended the proceedings.
(b) If an employer appeals a decision of the
director or appellate board, the costs of the proceedings of the appellate
board or the appellate court, together with reasonable attorney's fees, shall
be assessed against the employer if the employer loses; provided that if an
employer or an insurance carrier, other than the employer who appealed, is held
liable for compensation, the costs of the proceedings of the appellate board or
the appellate court, together with reasonable attorney's fees, shall be assessed
against the party held liable for the compensation. [L 1963, c 116, pt of §1;
Supp, §97-102; am L 1967, c 180, §1; HRS §386-93; am L 1969, c 244, §2g; am L
2004, c 202, §45; am L 2006, c 94, §1; am L 2010, c 109, §1; am L 2012, c 234, §1]
Rules of Court
See HRCP rule 54(d).
Law Journals and Reviews
One-Sided Bargain? Assessing the Fairness of Hawai‘i's
Workers' Compensation Law. 31 UH L. Rev. 553 (2009).
Case Notes
Attorney fees. 35 H. 591 (1940).
Reasonable grounds. 38 H. 405 (1949).
Party who prevailed on the crucial issue held to be the
prevailing party. 57 H. 535, 560 P.2d 1292 (1977).
Imposes liability for costs and fees incurred by nonappealing
employer on appealing employer who loses. 66 H. 290, 660 P.2d 1316 (1983).
An order regarding the award or denial of attorney's fees and
costs with respect to subsection (b) is a final order under §91-14(a) for
purposes of appeal; this final order rule applies prospectively to prevent
injustice; subsection (b) allows assessment of attorney's fees and costs
against an employer if the employer loses the final appeal. 104 H. 164, 86
P.3d 973 (2004).
Where appeals court's opinion regarding attorney's fees and
costs under this section was not ripe for decision, constituted an advisory
opinion akin to the issuance of an opinion when there was no subject matter
jurisdiction, and constituted inappropriate judicial interference with an
administrative decision of an entity within a separate, co-equal branch that
had not been formalized and had not yet affected the challenging parties in a
concrete way, thereby implicating separation-of-powers concerns, the appeals
court's exercise of appellate power constituted error. 121 H. 33, 211 P.3d 750
(2009).
Employee was entitled to award of costs and reasonable
attorney fees incurred in defending against a point of appeal that employer,
who did not file its own appeal, was permitted to raise at a pretrial
conference and ultimately lost during employee's appeal. 136 H. 483 (App.),
363 P.3d 331 (2015).
Imposes liability for costs and fees incurred by nonappealing
employer on appealing employer who loses; "crucial issue" test
applied. 5 H. App. 521, 704 P.2d 914 (1985).
When employer appeals decision of director or appeals board
and subsequently withdraws either entire appeal or any portion of appeal, or
concedes, the decision of director or appeals board becomes final and employer
is considered losing party for purposes of subsection (b). 84 H. 390 (App.),
935 P.2d 105 (1997).
Cited: 33 H. 634 (1935).
Notes of Decisions
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 211 P.3d 750 (Haw. 2009).
· cites it 125× “Based upon its remand of the case to the LIRAB, the ICA recognized that it could not decide the attorney's fees issue but, nevertheless, provided "guidance" to the LIRAB regarding the application of HRS § 386-93(b) on remand. On application, the City essentially contends that…”
Lindinha v. Hilo Coast Processing Co., 86 P.3d 973 (Haw. 2004).
· cites it 51× “We hold that (1) an order regarding the award or denial of attorney’s fees and costs with respect to Hawai'i Revised Statutes *165 (HRS) § 386-93(b) (1993) 1 is a final order under HRS § 91-14(a) (1993) for purposes of appeal, (2) this final order rule applies prospectively to…”
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 196 P.3d 306 (Haw. App. 2008).
· cites it 46× “HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp.2007) governs the award of attorney’s fees and costs in workers’ compensation cases and provides as follows: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board [2] or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been…”
Survivors of Iida v. Oriental Imports, Inc., 935 P.2d 105 (Haw. App. 1997).
· cites it 26× “Unlike HRS § 386-93(a), 14 which allows costs to be taxed against any party for frivolous appeals, HRS § 386-93(b) places the burden solely on the employer if the employer loses, regardless of the meritorious nature of the appeal.”
Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co., 660 P.2d 1316 (Haw. 1983).
· cites it 8× “Maui Pine’s second point on appeal necessitates a determination as to the proper application of HRS § 386-93. Initially, we note that Hawaii allows attorney’s fees only when authorized by statute, rule of court, agreement, stipulation, or Hawaiian precedent.”
Yamada v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Co., 704 P.2d 914 (Haw. App. 1985).
· cites it 17× “time in 1975 for which Appellees must pay him compensation; (3) Yamada’s 1974 and 1975 injury combined with his pre-1974 “ratable permanent disability” resulted in his permanent total disability effective September 17, 1975; and (4) the work injury for which Brewer is…”
Mitchell v. BWK Jt. Venture, 560 P.2d 1292 (Haw. 1977).
· cites it 2× “HRS § 386-93(b) (1975 Supp.) provides in pertinent part as follows: (b) If an employer appeals a decision of the director or appellate board, the costs of the proceedings of the appellate board or the supreme court of the State, together with reasonable attorney’s fees shall be…”
City of Louisville v. Slack, 39 S.W.3d 809 (Ky. 2001).
· cites it 2× “19, § 2350(f) (2000); Haw.Rev.Stat. § 386-93 (2000). The Florida statute provides, "If any proceedings are had for review of any claim, award, or compensation order before any court, the court may award the injured employee or dependent an attorney's fee to be paid by the…”
Irving v. Ocean House Builders, 363 P.3d 331 (Haw. App. 2015).
· cites it 37× “urposes of awarding attorney fees pursuant to HRS § 386-93(b), Employer “effectively appealed” the Director’s decision that Irving sustained work-related injuries on October 25, 2010 by seeking LIRAB’s review of this issue at the pretrial conference; (2) he was the prevailing…”
Kelly v. Metal-weld Specialties, Inc., 192 P.3d 613 (Haw. App. 2008).
· cites it 22× “HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp. 2007) provides: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been brought, prosecuted, or defended without reasonable ground the whole costs of the proceedings may be…”
Botelho v. Atlas Recycling Ctr., LLC. (Haw. 2020).
· cites it 9× “DCD also “assessed attorney’s fees and costs” against Atlas/HEMIC pursuant to HRS § 386-93(a) 4 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** (Supp.”
Costa, JR. v. Cnty. of Hawaii, 154 Haw. 40 (Haw. App. 2024).
· cites it 6× “] 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER independent psychiatric examination (IPE) and the subsequent IPE report's legal significance; and (7) considering Costa's available remedy under HRS § 386-93(a) (2015) in its Decision and Order.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 386-93(a) — 11 cases
Survivors of Iida v. Oriental Imports, Inc., 935 P.2d 105 (Haw. App. 1997).
“Unlike HRS § 386-93(a), 14 which allows costs to be taxed against any party for frivolous appeals, HRS § 386-93(b) places the burden solely on the employer if the employer loses, regardless of the meritorious nature of the appeal.”
Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co., 660 P.2d 1316 (Haw. 1983).
“Maui Pine’s second point on appeal necessitates a determination as to the proper application of HRS § 386-93. Initially, we note that Hawaii allows attorney’s fees only when authorized by statute, rule of court, agreement, stipulation, or Hawaiian precedent.”
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 196 P.3d 306 (Haw. App. 2008).
“HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp.2007) governs the award of attorney’s fees and costs in workers’ compensation cases and provides as follows: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board [2] or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been…”
Kelly v. Metal-weld Specialties, Inc., 192 P.3d 613 (Haw. App. 2008).
“HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp. 2007) provides: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been brought, prosecuted, or defended without reasonable ground the whole costs of the proceedings may be…”
Botelho v. Atlas Recycling Ctr., LLC. (Haw. 2020).
“DCD also “assessed attorney’s fees and costs” against Atlas/HEMIC pursuant to HRS § 386-93(a) 4 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** (Supp.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 386-93(b) — 9 cases
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 211 P.3d 750 (Haw. 2009).
“Based upon its remand of the case to the LIRAB, the ICA recognized that it could not decide the attorney's fees issue but, nevertheless, provided "guidance" to the LIRAB regarding the application of HRS § 386-93(b) on remand. On application, the City essentially contends that…”
Lindinha v. Hilo Coast Processing Co., 86 P.3d 973 (Haw. 2004).
“We hold that (1) an order regarding the award or denial of attorney’s fees and costs with respect to Hawai'i Revised Statutes *165 (HRS) § 386-93(b) (1993) 1 is a final order under HRS § 91-14(a) (1993) for purposes of appeal, (2) this final order rule applies prospectively to…”
Kapuwai v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, Dep't of Parks & Rec., 196 P.3d 306 (Haw. App. 2008).
“HRS § 386-93 (1993 & Supp.2007) governs the award of attorney’s fees and costs in workers’ compensation cases and provides as follows: (a) If the director of labor and industrial relations, appellate board [2] or any court finds that proceedings under this chapter have been…”
Survivors of Iida v. Oriental Imports, Inc., 935 P.2d 105 (Haw. App. 1997).
“Unlike HRS § 386-93(a), 14 which allows costs to be taxed against any party for frivolous appeals, HRS § 386-93(b) places the burden solely on the employer if the employer loses, regardless of the meritorious nature of the appeal.”
Yamada v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Co., 704 P.2d 914 (Haw. App. 1985).
“time in 1975 for which Appellees must pay him compensation; (3) Yamada’s 1974 and 1975 injury combined with his pre-1974 “ratable permanent disability” resulted in his permanent total disability effective September 17, 1975; and (4) the work injury for which Brewer is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.