Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 414
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 414-221 (2026)

]  General standards for directors

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

C.  Standards of Conduct

 

     [§414-221]  General standards for directors.  (a)  A director shall discharge the director's duties as a director, including the director's duties as a member of a committee:

     (1)  In good faith;

     (2)  With the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances; and

     (3)  In a manner the director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation.

     (b)  In determining the best interests of the corporation, a director, in addition to considering the interests of the corporation's shareholders, may consider, in the director's discretion, any of the following factors:

     (1)  The interests of the corporation's employees, customers, suppliers, and creditors;

     (2)  The economy of the State and the nation;

     (3)  Community and societal considerations, including, without limitation, the impact of any action upon the communities in or near which the corporation has offices or operations; and

     (4)  The long-term as well as short-term interests of the corporation and its shareholders, including, without limitation, the possibility that these interests may be best served by the continued independence of the corporation.

     (c)  In discharging duties as a director, the director is entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by:

     (1)  One or more officers or employees of the corporation whom the director reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented;

     (2)  Legal counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the director reasonably believes are within the person's professional or expert competence; or

     (3)  A committee of the board of directors of which the director is not a member if the director reasonably believes the committee merits confidence.

     (d)  A director is not acting in good faith if the director has knowledge concerning the matter in question that makes reliance otherwise permitted by subsection (c) unwarranted.

     (e)  A director is not liable for any action taken as a director, or any failure to take any action, if the director performed the duties of the director's office in compliance with this section. [L 2000, c 244, pt of §1]

 

Law Journals and Reviews

 

  The "Aloha Corporation:"  Infusing the Culture of Hawai`i to Broaden the Perspective of Business and Return to Community.  34 UH L. Rev. 221 (2012).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2008 · leading case: Kaho'ohanohano v. State.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kaho'ohanohano v. State (Haw. 2007). · cites it 2× “See also HRS §§ 414-221, -233 (1993) (delineating standards of conduct for corporate directors and officers).”
Honda Ex Rel. Kamakana v. Bd. of Trs. of the Employees' Ret. Sys. (Haw. 2005). · cites it 4× “See also HRS §§ 414-221, -233 (1993) (delineating standards of conduct for corporate directors and officers).”
Kahoohanohano v. State (Haw. 2007). · cites it 2× “See also HRS §§ 414-221, -233 (1993) (delineating standards of conduct for corporate directors and officers).”
Tsutsumi v. Hawaii Prince Hotel Waikiki Corp. (Haw. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “A director's duties are provided in HRS § 414-221 which states, in relevant part: General standards for directors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.