Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 481-6 (2025)

  When sale at less than cost permitted

✓ laws through the 2025 session: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §481-6  When sale at less than cost permitted.  Sections 481-3 to 481-5 shall not apply to any sale made:

     (1)  In closing out in good faith the owner's stock or any part thereof for the purpose of discontinuing the owner's trade in any such stock or commodity, and in the case of the sale of seasonal goods, or to the bona fide sale of perishable goods to prevent loss to the vendor by spoilage or depreciation, provided notice is given to the public thereof;

     (2)  When the goods are damaged or deteriorated in quality, and notice is given to the public thereof;

     (3)  By an officer acting under the orders of any court;

     (4)  In an endeavor made in good faith to meet the lawful prices of a competitor, as herein defined, selling the same article or product, or service or output of a service trade, in the same locality or trade area;

     (5)  By the government or any agency thereof, of the United States, the State, or any county, or by post exchanges or ships' service stores operating under and in accordance with United States army or naval regulations.

     In case of any sale at less than cost which does not fall within (1) to (5) of this section, the burden of proof shall be on the defendant to show that the sale was not made for the purpose of injuring competitors and destroying competition within the meaning of this part.

     Any person, firm, or corporation who performs work upon, renovates, alters, or improves any personal property belonging to another person, firm, or corporation, shall be construed to be a vendor within the meaning of this part. [L 1937, c 223, §6; am L 1941, c 175, §2; RL 1945, §9326; am L 1955, c 241, §1(c); RL 1955, §205-7; HRS §481-6; gen ch 1985]

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1981–1981 · leading case: Island Tobacco Co. v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 627 P.2d 260 (Haw. 1981).
Island Tobacco Co. v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 627 P.2d 260 (Haw. 1981). · cites it 3× “We are convinced there was no intent to effect a change of policy because HRS § 481-1 still speaks of price discrimination with an intent “to prevent the competition of any person” and HRS § 481-6, where certain below-cost sales are exempted from § 481-3’s purview, still…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.