Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 602-21 (2026)

  Renumbered as §602-11

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §602-21  Renumbered as §602-11.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1973–1979 · leading case: In Interest of Doe, 598 P.2d 176 (Haw. 1979).
In Interest of Doe, 598 P.2d 176 (Haw. 1979). · cites it 2× “HRS § 602-21 (1976). Rule 129 is not a directory rule which may be dispensed with at the discretion of an individual judge.”
State v. Wilson, 519 P.2d 228 (Haw. 1974). · cites it 8× “) may be changed by promulgation of new rules by this Court pursuant to HRS § 602-21, I would hold that a District Court has no jurisdiction to entertain or grant a motion to strike, intended to be used in lieu of a motion to suppress, made at a preliminary hearing by the…”
Petition of Bar Ass'n of Hawaii, 516 P.2d 1267 (Haw. 1973). · cites it 2× “We are aware, also, as the attorney general has contended, that such an alteration of liability might be construed as an abridgment of the substantive rights of a client-litigant and therefore in contravention of HRS § 602-21 which forbids such modifications.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.