[PART I.
SELECTION AND SERVICE]
Revision Note
Part heading added pursuant to §23G-15.
[§612-1] Declaration of policy. It is
the policy of this State that all persons selected for jury service be selected
at random from a fair cross section of the population of the area served by the
court, and that all qualified citizens have the opportunity in accordance with
this chapter to be considered for jury service in this State and an obligation
to serve as jurors when summoned for that purpose. [L 1973, c 191, pt of §1]
Cross References
Right to trial by jury of the "district" conferred
by Const. art. I, §14. "District" means the judicial circuit,
§806-17.
Law Journals and Reviews
State v. Levinson: Limitations on a Criminal Defendant's Use
of Peremptory Challenges. 13 UH L. Rev. 279 (1991).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1990–1996 · leading case:
State v. Samonte, 928 P.2d 1 (Haw. 1996).
State v. Samonte, 928 P.2d 1 (Haw. 1996).
· cites it 3× “It is the policy of this State that all persons selected for jury service be selected at random from a fair cross section of the population of the area served by the court, and that all qualified citizens have the opportunity in accordance with this chapter to be considered for…”
State v. Levinson, 795 P.2d 845 (Haw. 1990).
· cites it 4× “HRS § 612-1 provides: It is the policy of this State that all persons selected for jury service be selected at random from a fair cross section of the population of the area served by the court, and that all qualified citizens have the opportunity in accordance with this chapter…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.