Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 635
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 635-15 (2025)

  REPEALED

✓ laws through the 2025 session: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §635-15  REPEALED.  L 1980, c 164, §11.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1995 · leading case: State v. Nomura, 903 P.2d 718 (Haw. App. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Nomura, 903 P.2d 718 (Haw. App. 1995). · cites it 6× “HRE Rule 1102, which has no federal rule counterpart, replaced prior HRS §§ 635-15 and 635-17 (1976). 2 The Rule requires the court to instruct the jury on the law but precludes the court from commenting upon the evidence.”
State v. Amorin, 574 P.2d 895 (Haw. 1978). · cites it 4× “Thus, since the court’s instruction nullified the prosecuting attorney’s comment, we are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was rendered harmless.”
Cafarella v. Char, 615 P.2d 763 (Haw. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “It appears from the record that the trial court found as a matter of fact that appellee did not breach the duty he owed to appellant and that his actions did not cause damage to appellant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.