Hawaii Revised Statutes
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 635-20 (2026)
Less than unanimous verdict authorized
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§635-20 Less than unanimous verdict authorized. In all civil cases tried before a jury it shall be sufficient for the return of a verdict if at least five-sixths of the jurors agree on the verdict. [L 1965, c 171, §1; Supp, §231-28; HRS §635-20]
Cross References
Trial by jury, see Const. art. I, §13.
Rules of Court
See HRCP rule 48.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1982–2011 · leading case: State v. Arceo, 928 P.2d 843 (Haw. 1996).
State v. Arceo, 928 P.2d 843 (Haw. 1996). “" HRS § 635-20 (1993) provides that "[i]n all civil cases tried before a jury it shall be sufficient for the return of a verdict if at least five-sixths of the jurors agree on the verdict.”
State v. Villeza, 942 P.2d 522 (Haw. 1997). “HRS § 635-20(1993). 12 . HRS § 635-30 (1993).”
Kanahele v. HAN, 263 P.3d 726 (Haw. 2011). “2d 522, 532 (1997); see HRS § 635-20(1993) ("In all civil cases tried before a jury it shall be sufficient for the return of a verdict if at least five-sixths of the jurors agree on the verdict.”
Cabral v. McBryde Sugar Co., Ltd., 647 P.2d 1232 (Haw. App. 1982). “HRS § 635-20 (1976). 2 Concerning the propriety of the interrogation of jury members after the jury’s verdict, we cite the admonition contained in In Re Bouslog-Sawyer, 41 Haw.”
Mahoney v. Mitchell, 668 P.2d 35 (Haw. App. 1983). “5 See Hawaii Revised Statutes § 635-20 (1976). 6 It would have been within the trial court’s discretion to answer the juror’s questions.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 635-20(1993) — 2 cases
State v. Villeza, 942 P.2d 522 (Haw. 1997). “HRS § 635-20(1993). 12 . HRS § 635-30 (1993).”
Kanahele v. HAN, 263 P.3d 726 (Haw. 2011). “2d 522, 532 (1997); see HRS § 635-20(1993) ("In all civil cases tried before a jury it shall be sufficient for the return of a verdict if at least five-sixths of the jurors agree on the verdict.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.