Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-12 (2026)

  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §657-12  REPEALED.  L 1972, c 105, §1(q).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1973–1981 · leading case: Higa v. Mirikitani, 517 P.2d 1 (Haw. 1973).
Higa v. Mirikitani, 517 P.2d 1 (Haw. 1973). · cites it 20× “intiff now appeals to this court, urging as error the following points: (1) the trial court erred in applying HRS § 657-7 to the facts of this case and should have applied either the six-year statute of limitations for actions of a contractual nature contained in HRS § 657-1(1),…”
Au v. Au, 626 P.2d 173 (Haw. 1981). · cites it 2× “Originally, this section was a four-year limitations period set forth in HRS § 657-12, which was repealed in S.L.H.”
Mun Seek Pai v. First Hawaiian Bank, 558 P.2d 479 (Haw. 1977). · cites it 4× “1 HRS § 657-12 reads: §657-12 All other personal actions.”
Sotomura v. Cnty. of Hawaii, 402 F. Supp. 95 (D. Haw. 1975). · cites it 2× “This court believes such actions would be covered by Section 657-12, H.R.S., which was enacted in the same year as Section 657-11, H.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.