Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 701-107 (2026)

Grades and classes of offenses

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§701-107 Grades and classes of offenses. (1) An offense defined by this Code or by any other statute of this State for which a sentence of imprisonment is authorized constitutes a crime. Crimes are of three grades: felonies, misdemeanors, and petty misdemeanors. Felonies include murder in the first and second degrees, attempted murder in the first and second degrees, and the following three classes: class A, class B, and class C.

(2) A crime is a felony if it is so designated in this Code or if persons convicted thereof may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term which is in excess of one year.

(3) A crime is a misdemeanor if it is so designated in this Code or in a statute other than this Code enacted subsequent thereto, or if it is defined in a statute other than this Code which provides for a term of imprisonment the maximum of which is one year.

(4) A crime is a petty misdemeanor if it is so designated in this Code or in a statute other than this Code enacted subsequent thereto, or if it is defined by a statute other than this Code that provides that persons convicted thereof may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term not to exceed thirty days.

(5) An offense defined by this Code or by any other statute of this State constitutes a violation if it is so designated in this Code or in the law defining the offense or if no other sentence than a fine, or fine and forfeiture or other civil penalty, is authorized upon conviction or if it is defined by a statute other than this Code which provides that the offense shall not constitute a crime. A violation does not constitute a crime, and conviction of a violation shall not give rise to any civil disability based on conviction of a criminal offense.

(6) Any offense declared by law to constitute a crime, without specification of the grade thereof or of the sentence authorized upon conviction, is a misdemeanor.

(7) An offense defined by any statute of this State other than this Code shall be classified as provided in this section and the sentence that may be imposed upon conviction thereof shall hereafter be governed by this Code. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1; am L 1987, c 181, §1; am L 2005, c 18, §1]

Cross References

Authorized disposition of convicted defendants, see §706-605.

Classes of felonies, see §706-610.

COMMENTARY ON §701-107

This section makes it clear that the Code retains the ancient distinction between felonies and misdemeanors, which is important for many procedural purposes. Its main thrust, however, is to govern the classification of offenses defined outside the Code. Subsection (7) declares that all offenses are hereafter to be classified according to this section and punished in accordance with this Code. The purpose is to rationalize the often anomalous classification and punishment of offenses that appear in many parts of the statutory laws.

Hereafter an offense is a felony if it is so designated or if imprisonment for a term in excess of one year is possible. A crime is a misdemeanor if it is so designated in the Code or in a statute enacted after the Code or if it is defined in another statute which sets the maximum term of imprisonment at exactly one year. Other crimes are petty misdemeanors. This will have the effect of reducing the possible sentence for crimes defined in other statutes which provide now for imprisonment for periods ranging from 31 days to just under one year, because the maximum permissible period of imprisonment for a petty misdemeanor is 30 days. The alternative of making such offenses misdemeanors was rejected, because such a classification would in many cases have the undesirable effect of increasing the permissible punishment to one year, the Code's maximum for misdemeanors. However, subsection (6) makes it clear that where no specification of grade or punishment is made, but the offense is declared to be a crime, classification will be as a misdemeanor for purposes of sentencing under this Code.

Subsection (5) creates a class of non-criminal offenses, called violations. No imprisonment may follow conviction of a violation, nor may any civil disabilities be imposed. Classification as a violation would be appropriate for many sumptuary offenses and other offenses of strict liability.

SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTARY ON §701-107

Act 181, Session Laws 1987, added language to this section to reflect the recently created statutory murder and attempted murder crimes. These crimes are murder in the first and second degree and attempted murder in the first and second degree. Senate Standing Committee Report No. 1130.

Act 18, Session Laws 2005, amended this section to clearly define a petty misdemeanor as a criminal offense for which the maximum prison term is not to exceed thirty days. Act 18 addressed an inconsistency in the Penal Code with respect to the statutory definition of a petty misdemeanor and the maximum prison term that may be imposed for the conviction of a petty misdemeanor offense. Senate Standing Committee Report No. 1303.

Case Notes

Subsection (5) cited: 62 H. 222, 615 P.2d 730 (1980).

"Choice of evils" defense applies to violations. 9 H. App. 115, 826 P.2d 884 (1992).

Although a violation does not constitute a crime, it constitutes a penal offense and the legislature intended its penalties to be criminal penalties. 10 H. App. 220, 864 P.2d 1109 (1993).

Defendant did not have a constitutional right to a jury trial for a violation of §852-1, refusal to provide ingress or egress while walking a labor picket line, where the maximum punishment was thirty days in jail or a $200 fine, or both, and violation was thus a petty misdemeanor under subsection (4). 110 H. 139 (App.), 129 P.3d 1167 (2006).

Cited: 132 H. 36, 319 P.3d 1044 (2014).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 58 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: State v. Dudoit, 978 P.2d 700 (Haw. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Dudoit, 978 P.2d 700 (Haw. 1999). · cites it 20× “HRS § 701-107 (1993) provides in relevant part: Grades and classes of offenses.”

Barker v. Young., 528 P.3d 217 (Haw. 2023). · cites it 12× “Barker argued that the only relevant definitions of 5 HRS § 701-107 provides in relevant part: (1) An offense defined by this Code or by any other statute of this State for which a sentence of imprisonment is authorized constitutes a crime.”

State v. Ganal, 917 P.2d 370 (Haw. 1996). · cites it 8× “Therefore, if the use of a firearm is not read as a separate and distinct element, a person who "knowingly possesses or intentionally uses or threatens to use" a firearm in the commission of any crime, be it a felony, misdemeanor, or petty misdemeanor, see HRS § 701-107 (1993),…”

State v. Yong Shik Won, 372 P.3d 1065 (Haw. 2015). · cites it 8× “Compare HRS §§ 701-107, with 291E-61 (b)(1)(C)(ii).”

State v. Kaakimaka, 933 P.2d 617 (Haw. 1997). · cites it 9× “HRS § 701-107 (1985) provided in relevant part: Grades and classes of offenses.”

Paul v. Dep't of Transp., State, 168 P.3d 546 (Haw. 2007). · cites it 10× “2d 148, 153 (1971) (“It is fundamental that a penal statute clearly define proscribed behavior, for failing this, definitional uncertainty denies an accused ‘due process of law’ guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article] I, s[ection] 2 of the…”

State v. Silva, 979 P.2d 1137 (Haw. App. 1999). · cites it 16× “) For example, the court said an officer may order a driver out of his or her car for driving without a license, a misdemeanor, and therefore a crime as defined in HRS § 701-107 (1993), [4] but not for failing to have a license in his or her possession, a violation and therefore…”

State v. Soto, 933 P.2d 66 (Haw. 1997). · cites it 7× “HRS § 701-107 (1985) provided in relevant part: Grades and classes of offense.”

State v. Kalua., 434 P.3d 1202 (Haw. 2019). · cites it 13× “Under HRS § 701-107 -titled "Grades and classes of offenses"-speeding is included within a class of non-criminal "offenses," termed "a violation.”

State v. Riveira, 993 P.2d 580 (Haw. App. 2000). · cites it 12× “) For example, in State v. Lau, 78 Hawai`i 54, 59, 890 P.”

State v. Chow, 883 P.2d 663 (Haw. App. 1994). · cites it 6× “HRS § 701-107(1) (Supp.1992); HRS § 701-107(3) (1985).”

State v. Lau, 890 P.2d 291 (Haw. 1995). · cites it 6× “HRS § 701-107(1) (1992) provides in relevant part, “An offense defined by this Code or by any other statute of this State for which a sentence of imprisonment is authorized constitutes a crime.”

Show all 58 citing cases →

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 701-107(1) — 11 cases

State v. Ganal, 917 P.2d 370 (Haw. 1996). “Therefore, if the use of a firearm is not read as a separate and distinct element, a person who "knowingly possesses or intentionally uses or threatens to use" a firearm in the commission of any crime, be it a felony, misdemeanor, or petty misdemeanor, see HRS § 701-107 (1993),…”

State v. Dudoit, 978 P.2d 700 (Haw. 1999). “HRS § 701-107 (1993) provides in relevant part: Grades and classes of offenses.”

State v. Riveira, 993 P.2d 580 (Haw. App. 2000). “) For example, in State v. Lau, 78 Hawai`i 54, 59, 890 P.”

State v. Lau, 890 P.2d 291 (Haw. 1995). “HRS § 701-107(1) (1992) provides in relevant part, “An offense defined by this Code or by any other statute of this State for which a sentence of imprisonment is authorized constitutes a crime.”

State v. Soto, 933 P.2d 66 (Haw. 1997). “HRS § 701-107 (1985) provided in relevant part: Grades and classes of offense.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 701-107(2) — 4 cases

State v. Alangcas., 345 P.3d 181 (Haw. 2015).

Jones v. State, 23 A.3d 880 (Md. 2011).

State v. Isomura, 839 P.2d 1186 (Haw. App. 1992).

Off. of Disciplinary Couns. v. Fujiyama (Haw. 2013).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 701-107(3) — 3 cases

State v. Chow, 883 P.2d 663 (Haw. App. 1994). “HRS § 701-107(1) (Supp.1992); HRS § 701-107(3) (1985).”

State v. Sadler, 910 P.2d 143 (Haw. App. 1996).

Off. of the Pub. Def. v. Connors (Haw. 2020).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 701-107(4) — 13 cases

State v. Yong Shik Won, 372 P.3d 1065 (Haw. 2015). “Compare HRS §§ 701-107, with 291E-61 (b)(1)(C)(ii).”

State v. Emerson, 129 P.3d 1167 (Haw. App. 2006).

State v. Armitage., 319 P.3d 1044 (Haw. 2014).

State v. Mageo, 889 P.2d 1092 (Haw. App. 1995).

State v. King., 386 P.3d 886 (Haw. 2016).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 701-107(5) — 25 cases

Paul v. Dep't of Transp., State, 168 P.3d 546 (Haw. 2007). “2d 148, 153 (1971) (“It is fundamental that a penal statute clearly define proscribed behavior, for failing this, definitional uncertainty denies an accused ‘due process of law’ guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article] I, s[ection] 2 of the…”

State v. Barros, 48 P.3d 584 (Haw. 2002).

State v. Dudoit, 978 P.2d 700 (Haw. 1999). “HRS § 701-107 (1993) provides in relevant part: Grades and classes of offenses.”

State v. Kalua., 434 P.3d 1202 (Haw. 2019). “Under HRS § 701-107 -titled "Grades and classes of offenses"-speeding is included within a class of non-criminal "offenses," termed "a violation.”

Barker v. Young., 528 P.3d 217 (Haw. 2023). “Barker argued that the only relevant definitions of 5 HRS § 701-107 provides in relevant part: (1) An offense defined by this Code or by any other statute of this State for which a sentence of imprisonment is authorized constitutes a crime.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 701-107(7) — 2 cases

State v. Emerson, 129 P.3d 1167 (Haw. App. 2006).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.