Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-647 (2026)

  Civil enforcement

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §706-647  Civil enforcement.  (1)  A certified or exemplified copy of an order of any court of this State for payment of a fine or restitution pursuant to section 706-605 may be filed in the office of the clerk of an appropriate court of this State as a special proceeding without the assessment of a filing fee or surcharge.  The order, whether as an independent order, as part of a judgment and sentence, or as a condition of probation or deferred plea, shall be enforceable in the same manner as a civil judgment.

     (2)  In the event the victim has received or applied for reimbursement from any governmental entity, the victim named in the order or the victim's attorney shall also mail notice of the filing to the governmental entity providing reimbursement and shall file proof of mailing with the clerk.

     (3)  Fees for docketing, transcription, or other enforcement proceedings shall be as provided by law for judgments of a court of this State. [L 1998, c 269, pt of §1; am L 2000, c 113, §1]

 

COMMENTARY ON §706-647

 

  Act 269, Session Laws 1998, added this section and §706-646 to allow victims of crime to enforce a criminal restitution order in the same manner as a civil judgment.  Under current law, a defendant may be required by the court to pay restitution for losses caused to the victim.  Collection of the restitution was left to governmental entities such as the judiciary, paroling authority, and department of public safety; these entities often were able to collect only a small fraction of the amount.  Moreover, although the criminal injuries compensation commission helped victims by providing some compensation, victims of property crimes and some violent crimes were ineligible for any compensation from the commission.  Furthermore, although a victim may bring a civil action against the defendant, the process was costly and time-consuming.  The legislature believed that victims should have a "fast track" ability to be compensated for their losses by allowing victims to enforce the criminal restitution order as a civil judgment, using all of the civil collection remedies.  Conference Committee Report No. 89.

  Act 113, Session Laws 2000, amended this section to authorize the waiver of filing fees when victims of crime seek civil enforcement of court-ordered restitution.  Conference Committee Report No. 40.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: State v. Werner, 1 P.3d 760 (Haw. App. 2000).
State v. Werner, 1 P.3d 760 (Haw. App. 2000). · cites it 14× “Thus, HRS § 706-647 (Supp.1999) does not apply and the restitution order is not enforceable as a civil judgment.”
State v. Rivera, 102 P.3d 1044 (Haw. 2004). · cites it 2× “(1) Except as provided in parts II and IV of this chapter or in section 706-647 and subsections (2) and (6) of this section and subject to the applicable provisions of this Code, the court may sentence a convicted defendant to one or more of the following dispositions: (a) To be…”
State v. Martin, 79 P.3d 686 (Haw. App. 2003). · cites it 7× “HRS § 706-647 (Supp.2002). § 706-644 Consequences of nonpayment; imprisonment for contumacious nonpayment; summary collection.”
State v. Kealoha., 414 P.3d 98 (Haw. 2018). · cites it 2× “See HRS § 657-5 (2001) (permitting "any judgment or decree" to extend no longer than "twenty years from the date of the original judgment or decree.”
State v. Sequeira, 995 P.2d 335 (Haw. App. 2000). · cites it 5× “1998), 5 and HRS § 706-647 (Supp.1998), 6 also added by Act 269.”
State v. Kai, 44 P.3d 288 (Haw. App. 2002). · cites it 5× “HRS § 706-647, as amended in 1998, provided in relevant part: § 706-647 Civil enforcement.”
State v. Johnson, 986 P.2d 987 (Haw. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The State may collect the fine, including costs, interest, and attorney’s fees pursuant to section 706-647. The foregoing amendment makes it plain that restitution orders, whether they be independent or imposed as conditions of probation, may be collected in the same manner as a…”
State v. DeMello, 310 P.3d 1033 (Haw. App. 2013). “(1) Except as provided in parts II and IV or in section 706-647 and subsections (2), (6), and (7), and subject to the applicable provisions of this Code, the court may sentence a convicted defendant to one or more of the following dispositions: (a) To be placed on probation as…”
State v. Kilborn, 127 P.3d 95 (Haw. App. 2005). “(1) Except as provided in parts II [Probation] and IV [Imprisonment] of this chapter or in section 706-647 [Civil enforcement] and subsections (2) and (6) of this section and subject to the applicable provisions of this Code, the court may sentence a convicted defendant to one…”
State v. Sumera, 39 P.3d 557 (Haw. 2002). “(1) Except as provided in parts II and IV of this chapter or in section 706-647 and subsections (2) and (6) of this section and subject to the applicable provisions of this Code, the court may sentence a convicted defendant to one or more of the following dispositions: (a) To be…”
State v. Feliciano, 81 P.3d 1184 (Haw. 2003). “The State may collect the fine, including costs, interest, and attorney's fees pursuant to section 706-647. HRS § 706-644 (Supp.1998) (emphases added).”
State v. Fay. ICA s.d.o., filed 10/31/2023 [ada], 153 Haw. 305. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 01/09/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 02/23/2024 [ada]., 550 P.3d 1163 (Haw. 2024). · cites it 2× “The independent order – commonly called a freestanding order - referenced HRS § 706-647 (2014). District Court Judge Lauren Akitake asked Fay what she could afford to pay.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-647(1) — 2 cases
State v. Kealoha., 414 P.3d 98 (Haw. 2018). “See HRS § 657-5 (2001) (permitting "any judgment or decree" to extend no longer than "twenty years from the date of the original judgment or decree.”
State v. Elicker, 177 P.3d 361 (Haw. App. 2008).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.