Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-713 (2026)

  Reckless endangering in the first degree

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §707-713  Reckless endangering in the first degree.  (1)  A person commits the offense of reckless endangering in the first degree if the person employs widely dangerous means in a manner which recklessly places another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury or intentionally fires a firearm in a manner which recklessly places another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury.

     (2)  Reckless endangering in the first degree is a class C felony. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1; am L 1978, c 215, §1; am L 1988, c 285, §1; gen ch 1992]

 

Case Notes

 

  Under §701-109(4)(a) and (c), reckless endangering in the first degree under this section is an included offense of attempted murder in the second degree under §707-701.5.  94 H. 513 (App.), 17 P.3d 862 (2001).

  Cited:  55 H. 531, 534, 523 P.2d 299 (1974).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: State v. Rumbawa, 17 P.3d 862 (Haw. App. 2001).
State v. Rumbawa, 17 P.3d 862 (Haw. App. 2001). · cites it 25× “Pursuant to a jury-waived trial, Rumbawa was acquitted as to Count 1; convicted of the included offense of Reckless Endangering in the First Degree in violation of HRS § 707-713 (1993) as to Count 2; convicted as to Counts 3-6 as charged; and convicted as to Count 7 as charged.”
State v. Brantley, 56 P.3d 1252 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 8× “For example, the offenses listed that do not specifically include a firearm as an element constituting such offense include first degree reckless endangering in violation of HRS § 707-713 (1993), which requires either conduct involving "widely dangerous means" or the intentional…”
State v. De Guair, 118 P.3d 662 (Haw. 2005). · cites it 12× “5; (3) attempted murder in the first degree (Count III), in violation of HRS §§ 705-500 and 707-701 (1986); (4) reckless endangering in the first degree (Counts IV, V, and VI), in violation of HRS § 707-713 (Supp.1992); [3] and (5) possession of a firearm in the commission of a…”
State v. Mara, 41 P.3d 157 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 8× “On March 11, 1999, following a jury trial presided over by the Honorable Dexter Del Rosario, defendant-appellant Dean Mara was convicted of: manslaughter, in violation of Hawai`i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-702(1)(a) (1993) [1] ; reckless endangering in the first degree, in…”
State v. Cabagbag, 277 P.3d 1027 (Haw. 2012). · cites it 4× “"), superseded by statute on other grounds, HRS § 707-713). [30] The majority states that whether jury instructions on eyewitness identification actually have a positive effect on juror sensitivity has not been conclusively proven.”
State v. Rapoza, 22 P.3d 968 (Haw. 2001). · cites it 4× “affirmed in part and vacated in part the first circuit court’s judgment of conviction of and sentence for two firearm offenses (two *323 counts) and the offenses of attempted assault in the first degree (two counts), in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 705-500…”
State v. Deleon., 319 P.3d 382 (Haw. 2014). · cites it 4× “II); Carrying or Use of Firearm in the Commission of a Separate Felony in violation of HRS § 134-21 as to Count II (Count IV); Carrying or Use of Firearm in the Commission of a Separate Felony in violation of HRS § 134-21 as to Count III (Count V); Place to Keep Pistol or…”
State v. Jumila, 950 P.2d 1201 (Haw. 1998). · cites it 4× “ally use or threaten to use a firearm while engaged in the commission of a separate felony, whether the firearm was loaded or not, and whether operable or not; provided that a person shall not be prosecuted under this subsection where the separate felony is: (1) A felony…”
State v. Kaua, 72 P.3d 473 (Haw. 2003). · cites it 2× “1999) (Count IX); (8) reckless endangering in the first degree, in violation of HRS § 707-713 (1993) (Counts X-XII); and (9) carrying or use of firearm in the commission of a separate felony, in violation of HRS § 134-6(a) and (e) (Supp.”
State v. Feliciano, 115 P.3d 648 (Haw. 2005). · cites it 4× “]; provided that a person shall not be prosecuted under this subsection where the separate felony is: (1) A felony offense otherwise defined by this chapter; (2) The felony offense of reckless endangering in the first degree under section 707-713; (3) The felony offense of…”
State v. Perez, 976 P.2d 379 (Haw. 1999). · cites it 4× “5(1993), 2 and 706-656 (1993) 3 (Count I), attempted assault in the first degree, in violation of HRS §§ 705-500 and 707-710 (1993) 4 (Count II), and two counts of reckless endangering in the first degree, in violation of HRS § 707-713 (1993) 5 (Counts III and V).”
State v. Perez, 976 P.2d 427 (Haw. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “1996), 3 of Nova Perez (Nova) and Robert Ilae (Ilae), respectively; Counts III-V, Reckless Endangering in the First Degree, HRS § 707-713 (1993), 4 of Eric Nakashima (Nakashima), Anthony Rivera (Rivera), and Ronald Buckingham (Buckingham), respectively; Count VI, Place to Keep…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-713(1) — 11 cases
State v. Mara, 41 P.3d 157 (Haw. 2002). “On March 11, 1999, following a jury trial presided over by the Honorable Dexter Del Rosario, defendant-appellant Dean Mara was convicted of: manslaughter, in violation of Hawai`i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-702(1)(a) (1993) [1] ; reckless endangering in the first degree, in…”
State v. Holbron, 904 P.2d 912 (Haw. 1995).
State v. Rumbawa, 17 P.3d 862 (Haw. App. 2001). “Pursuant to a jury-waived trial, Rumbawa was acquitted as to Count 1; convicted of the included offense of Reckless Endangering in the First Degree in violation of HRS § 707-713 (1993) as to Count 2; convicted as to Counts 3-6 as charged; and convicted as to Count 7 as charged.”
State v. Perez, 976 P.2d 427 (Haw. App. 1998). “1996), 3 of Nova Perez (Nova) and Robert Ilae (Ilae), respectively; Counts III-V, Reckless Endangering in the First Degree, HRS § 707-713 (1993), 4 of Eric Nakashima (Nakashima), Anthony Rivera (Rivera), and Ronald Buckingham (Buckingham), respectively; Count VI, Place to Keep…”
State v. Martins, 102 P.3d 1034 (Haw. 2005).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.