Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-780 (2026)

§ 707-780

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Part viii.]  labor trafficking

 

     [§707-780]  Definitions.  As used in this part:

     "Deadly force" has the same meaning as in section 703-300.

     "Force" has the same meaning as in section 703-300.

     "Labor" means work of economic or financial value.  Prostitution-related and obscenity-related activities as set forth in chapter 712 are not forms of "labor" under this part.

     "Services" means a relationship between a person and the actor in which the person performs activities under the supervision of or for the benefit of the actor or a third party.  Prostitution-related and obscenity-related activities as set forth in chapter 712 are not forms of "services" under this part.

     "Unlawful force" has the same meaning as in section 703‑300.

     "Venture" means a business relationship between two or more parties to undertake economic activity together.

     "Victim" means the person against whom an offense specified in section 707-781 or 707-782 has been committed. [L 2011, c 146, pt of §1]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–2014 · leading case: State v. Arceo, 928 P.2d 843 (Haw. 1996).
State v. Arceo, 928 P.2d 843 (Haw. 1996). · cites it 2× “” The mutually exclusive positions advanced by the parties in this appeal generate a threshold question, namely, whether (as the prosecution maintains) Arceo’s alleged “repeated acts occurring over a period of time” could be aggregated into a two-count indictment—organized…”
People v. Cardenas, 338 P.3d 430 (Colo. Ct. App. 2014). “06 (2014); Haw.Rev.Stat. §§ 707-780 to -782 (2014); Idaho Code Ann.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-780(l)(b) — 1 case
State v. Arceo, 928 P.2d 843 (Haw. 1996). “” The mutually exclusive positions advanced by the parties in this appeal generate a threshold question, namely, whether (as the prosecution maintains) Arceo’s alleged “repeated acts occurring over a period of time” could be aggregated into a two-count indictment—organized…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.