Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 708
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-8120 (2025)

and 708-8121  REPEALED

✓ laws through the 2025 session: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART XI.  MONETARY LAUNDERING--REPEALED

 

     §§708-8120 and 708-8121  REPEALED.  L 1995, c 119, §3.

 

Cross References

 

  For present provisions, see chapter 708A.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: State v. Kahapea, 141 P.3d 440 (Haw. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Kahapea, 141 P.3d 440 (Haw. 2006). · cites it 8× “HRS § 708-8120(1) provided: Any person who conducts or attempts to conduct a transaction involving a monetary instrument or instruments of a value exceeding $5,000 through a financial institution (a) with the intent to promote, manage, establish, carry on, conceal, disguise, or…”
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-8120(1): 1 case
State v. Kahapea, 141 P.3d 440 (Haw. 2006). “HRS § 708-8120(1) provided: Any person who conducts or attempts to conduct a transaction involving a monetary instrument or instruments of a value exceeding $5,000 through a financial institution (a) with the intent to promote, manage, establish, carry on, conceal, disguise, or…”
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-8120(1)(a): 1 case
State v. Kahapea, 141 P.3d 440 (Haw. 2006). “HRS § 708-8120(1) provided: Any person who conducts or attempts to conduct a transaction involving a monetary instrument or instruments of a value exceeding $5,000 through a financial institution (a) with the intent to promote, manage, establish, carry on, conceal, disguise, or…”
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-8120(l)(a): 1 case
State v. Kahapea, 141 P.3d 440 (Haw. 2006). “HRS § 708-8120(1) provided: Any person who conducts or attempts to conduct a transaction involving a monetary instrument or instruments of a value exceeding $5,000 through a financial institution (a) with the intent to promote, manage, establish, carry on, conceal, disguise, or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.