Hawaii Revised Statutes
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-891 (2026)
to 708-893 [OLD] REPEALED
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§§708-891 to 708-893 [OLD] REPEALED. L 2001, c 33, §§5 to 7.
§708-891 Computer fraud in the first degree. (1) A person commits the offense of computer fraud in the first degree if the person knowingly accesses a computer, computer system, or computer network with the intent to commit the offense of theft in the first degree.
(2) Computer fraud in the first degree is a class A felony. [L 2001, c 33, pt of §1; am L 2012, c 293, §2]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2024 · leading case: Hopkins v. State, 230 P.3d 433 (Haw. App. 2010).
Hopkins v. State, 230 P.3d 433 (Haw. App. 2010). “5 (1) (a) (1993) and 708-830 (1993), Computer Fraud, in violation of HRS § 708-891 (1) (b) (1993), and Money Laundering, in violation of HRS §§ 708A-3(a)(1)(A) (Supp.”
State v. Oki (Haw. App. 2020). “"); HRS § 708-891(2) (2014) ("Computer fraud 22 Oki also contends that the legislature's decision to remove theft from the purview of HRS § 708-893 in 2016 supports his argument that the statute imposed cruel and unusual punishment.”
State v. Wilson, 557 P.3d 909 (Haw. App. 2024). “Ass'n, 1 The State charged Wilson by indictment with Computer Fraud in the First Degree, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-891(1) (2014) (Count 1), and Theft in the First Degree, in violation of HRS §§ 708- 830.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-891(1) — 2 cases
Hopkins v. State, 230 P.3d 433 (Haw. App. 2010). “5 (1) (a) (1993) and 708-830 (1993), Computer Fraud, in violation of HRS § 708-891 (1) (b) (1993), and Money Laundering, in violation of HRS §§ 708A-3(a)(1)(A) (Supp.”
State v. Wilson, 557 P.3d 909 (Haw. App. 2024). “Ass'n, 1 The State charged Wilson by indictment with Computer Fraud in the First Degree, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-891(1) (2014) (Count 1), and Theft in the First Degree, in violation of HRS §§ 708- 830.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-891(2) — 1 case
State v. Oki (Haw. App. 2020). “"); HRS § 708-891(2) (2014) ("Computer fraud 22 Oki also contends that the legislature's decision to remove theft from the purview of HRS § 708-893 in 2016 supports his argument that the statute imposed cruel and unusual punishment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.