§712-1222 Promoting gambling in the second
degree. (1) A person commits the offense of promoting gambling in the
second degree if the person negligently advances or profits from gambling
activity.
(2) Promoting gambling in the second degree is
a class C felony. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1; am L 1973, c 201, pt of §1; am L
1987, c 83, §2; gen ch 1992; am L 2022, c 111, §5]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case:
Marsland v. Pang, 701 P.2d 175 (Haw. App. 1985).
Marsland v. Pang, 701 P.2d 175 (Haw. App. 1985).
· cites it 4× “Promoting gambling in the second degree in violation of HRS § 712-1222 (1976). 3. Gambling in violation of HRS § 712-1223 (1976).”
State v. Yip, 987 P.2d 996 (Haw. App. 1999).
· cites it 6× “se of all evidence, Appellant moved for judgment of acquittal grounded in the lack of any evidence that Appellant had personally received or had due and payable more than $1000—the monetary threshold set forth in HRS § 712-1221(l)(c) for promoting gambling in the first degree, a…”
State v. Bonnell, 856 P.2d 1265 (Haw. 1993).
· cites it 2× “Maielua was also charged with three counts of promoting gambling in the second degree (a misdemeanor) in violation of HRS § 712-1222 (Supp. 1992) and one count of possession of gambling records in the second degree (a misdemeanor) in violation of HRS § 712-1225 (1985).”
State v. Austria, 524 P.2d 290 (Haw. 1974).
· cites it 2× “The defendants were charged with the offense of Promoting Gambling in the Second Degree, HRS § 712-1222 (Supp. 1973). They moved to suppress evidence of the charged offense which had been seized pursuant to a search by search warrant of an alleged illegal gambling establishment.”
Kaneshiro v. Eleven, 150 Haw. 329 (Haw. 2021).
· cites it 8× “During that time, HPD did not initiate forfeiture proceedings pursuant to HRS § 712A-7(3) (1991)5, did not give notice of the seizure of forfeiture to all parties known to have an interest in the property and did not provide the prosecutors a written request for forfeiture as…”
Lewis v. Hawaiian Homes Comm'n (Haw. App. 2025).
· cites it 7× “) 8 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER advanced or profited from gambling activity, in violation of HRS § 712-1222 (2014). 8 "A person advances gambling activity if, having substantial proprietary control or other authoritative control over…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.