Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 78
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 78-3 (2026)

  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §78-3  REPEALED.  L 1984, c 85, §1.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1976–1984 · leading case: Daoang v. Dep't of Educ., 630 P.2d 629 (Haw. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Daoang v. Dep't of Educ., 630 P.2d 629 (Haw. 1981). · cites it 30× “The issue presented on this appeal is whether HRS § 78-3 (1976) 1 which mandates the retirement of all public employees at age 70 violates the equal protection and due process clauses of the Hawaii Constitution, article I, section 4 (as amended and renumbered article I, section…”
Nelson v. Miwa, 546 P.2d 1005 (Haw. 1976). · cites it 4× “, HRS § 78-3 (Supp. 1975), HRS § 88-73 (Supp.”
Levi v. Univ. of Hawaii, 679 P.2d 129 (Haw. 1984). “On May 22, 1981, this court *92 ruled that the U.H. Board of Regents exceeded its powers under the State constitution and the policy was in contradiction with Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 78-3 which allowed State employees to be mandatorily retired at age seventy, and…”
Levi v. Univ. of Hawaii, 628 P.2d 1026 (Haw. 1981). · cites it 9× “The court explained its reasoning as follows: The more critical question is whether the mandatory requirement policy violates the other provisions of HRS 78-3 which appears to set out or set forth a requirement that all State employees retire at 70.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.