[§8-17] Caregiver Recognition Day.
The first Saturday of November shall be known and designated as "Caregiver
Recognition Day", in recognition of the very significant role that
caregivers play in support of Hawaii's elderly and persons with disabilities.
This day is not and shall not be construed as a state holiday.
As used in this section, "caregiver"
means any person who has undertaken the care, custody, or physical assistance
of an elderly or disabled person, including but not limited to compensated or
uncompensated family members or other relatives, or any person who has the
desire, or a legal, or contractual duty to care for the health, safety, and
welfare of an elderly or disabled person, including owners, operators,
employees, or staff of long-term care facilities and community home-based
institutions. [L 2008, c 6, §1]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1958–2024 · leading case:
Akana v. Damon, 42 Haw. 415 (1958).
Akana v. Damon, 42 Haw. 415 (1958).
“1955, § 8-17, provides: “In all proceedings under this part the court shall have power at any stage of the proceeding to allow amendments in form or substance in any complaint, citation, summons, process, answer, motion, order, verdict, judgment or other proceeding, including…”
Kendrick v. Plan. Dep't of the Cnty. of Kaua'i., No. CAAP-20-0000573 (Haw. App. Oct. 25, 2024).
“§ 46-4 (a), is to be liberally construed to permit the nonconforming use of the Subject Property to continue provided TVNCU #4308 is maintained and registered with the Planning Department pursuant to KCC § 8-17(h). See generally In the Interest of CM, 141 Hawaiʻi at 353, 409 P.”
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 8-17(h): 1 case
Kendrick v. Plan. Dep't of the Cnty. of Kaua'i., No. CAAP-20-0000573 (Haw. App. Oct. 25, 2024).
“§ 46-4 (a), is to be liberally construed to permit the nonconforming use of the Subject Property to continue provided TVNCU #4308 is maintained and registered with the Planning Department pursuant to KCC § 8-17(h). See generally In the Interest of CM, 141 Hawaiʻi at 353, 409 P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.