Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 8
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 8-23 (2026)

]  Homelessness Awareness Month

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     [§8-23]  Homelessness Awareness Month.  The month of November shall be known and designated as "Homelessness Awareness Month" to promote public awareness of homelessness as a significant societal, public health and welfare, and public housing shortage problem.  This month is not and shall not be construed as a state holiday. [L 2013, c 50, §1]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1962–1981 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Kashiwa v. Coney, 372 P.2d 348 (Haw. 1962).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Kashiwa v. Coney, 372 P.2d 348 (Haw. 1962). · cites it 11× “1955, § 8-23. Defendants’ first and fourth specifications of error will be considered together because they both involve the matter of setoffs.”
State v. Heirs of Kapahi, 437 P.2d 321 (Haw. 1968). · cites it 12× “If an order be made letting the plaintifE into possession as provided for in sections 8-26, 8-27 and 8-30, the final judgment shall include, as part of the just compensation and damages awarded, interest at the rate provided in section 8-23 from the date of such order until paid…”
State, by Atty. Gen. v. Pioneer Mill Co., 637 P.2d 1131 (Haw. 1981). · cites it 2× “2d 321, 322 (1968), involved the computation of “interest on the deficient principal under provisions of § 8-31 (now HRS § 101-33)” and the award of “interest under the provisions of § 8-23 (now HRS § 101-25).” As *185 in this case, the State did not object to the award of…”
City & Cnty. of Honolulu v. Kam, 402 P.2d 683 (Haw. 1965). · cites it 2× “1955, § 8-23, by its terms provides for 30 days without interest in which to pay a final judgment in eminent domain, 12 and we regard this as some index of the time required to process such a matter to payment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.