Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 8
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 8-25 (2026)

]  Human Trafficking Awareness Month

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     [§8-25]  Human Trafficking Awareness Month.  The month of January shall be known and designated as "Human Trafficking Awareness Month" to promote public awareness of human trafficking as a significant societal and public health crisis.  This month is not and shall not be construed to be a state holiday. [L 2013, c 246, §1]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1958–1968 · leading case: Helela v. State of Hawaii, 418 P.2d 482 (Haw. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Helela v. State of Hawaii, 418 P.2d 482 (Haw. 1966). · cites it 9× “1955, § 8-25. Under their specifications of error on appeal plaintiffs urge this court to hold that the trial judge erred (1) in ruling that the State has the right to change the public use of property acquired by condemnation and (2) in failing to rule that the claimed property…”
Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. Choy v. Damon, 356 P.2d 386 (Haw. 1960). · cites it 4× “1955, § 8-25; and (d) denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.”
Akana v. Damon, 42 Haw. 415 (Haw. 1958). · cites it 3× “1955, § 8-25, which allows damages upon abandonment of proceeding “before reaching a final judgment.”
Trask v. Kam, Exec. Est. Tam See, Decsd., 352 P.2d 320 (Haw. 1959). “1955, § 8-25. This motion for damages in Law No.”
State v. Heirs of Kapahi, 437 P.2d 321 (Haw. 1968). “Section 8-25, R.L.H. 1955, provides for the payment of damages to a defendant whenever condemnation proceedings are abandoned or discontinued “before reaching a final judgment.”
City & Cnty. of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co., 421 P.2d 300 (Haw. 1966). “Our statute guarantees to those who are entitled to compensation or damages in the event of a final taking, that if the proceeding is not completed, damages sustained by reason of the bringing of the proceeding and the taking of possession will be paid.”
Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Nutter v. Hawaiian Dredging Co., 42 Haw. 627 (Haw. 1958). “1955, § 8-25, to abandon an eminent domain proceeding at any time before reaching final judgment, and that the abandonment may be partial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.