Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 88-285 (2025)

  Service-connected disability retirement

✓ laws through the 2025 session: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §88-285  Service-connected disability retirement.  A member who would be eligible to receive a service-connected disability retirement allowance pursuant to section 88-79 shall receive a maximum retirement allowance of thirty-five per cent of the member's average final compensation. [L 1984, c 108, pt of §8; am L 2001, c 101, §5; am L 2004, c 179, §28; am L 2005, c 58, §20]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2014–2026 · leading case: Panado v. Bd. of Trs. Employees' Ret. Sys. State of Hawaii ., 332 P.3d 144 (Haw. 2014).
Panado v. Bd. of Trs. Employees' Ret. Sys. State of Hawaii ., 332 P.3d 144 (Haw. 2014). · cites it 4× “Petitioner has failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that her incapacity for further performance of duty was (a) the natural and proximate result of an accident which occurred October 9, 2004 or (b) the cumulative result of an occupational hazard, as required by HRS…”
Quel v. Bd. of Trs., No. SCWC-16-0000355 (Haw. Feb. 6, 2020). · cites it 4× “3 The ERS Board amended COL 1 to indicate that as a noncontributory plan member, Quel’s application was actually brought under HRS § 88-285 (Supp. 2005), not HRS § 88-336 (Supp.”
Gomes, Jr. v. Employees' Ret. Sys., 583 P.3d 1292 (Haw. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “See also HRS § 88-285 (2012) ("A member who would be eligible to receive a service-connected disability retirement allowance pursuant to section 88-79 shall receive a maximum retirement allowance of thirty-five per cent of the member's average final compensation.”
Robertson v. Bd. of Trs. of the Employees' Ret. Sys. of the State of Hawai'i, 154 Haw. 406 (Haw. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “4 HRS § 88-285 provides: § 88-285 Service-connected disability retirement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.