Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5 (2026)

Hawaii labor relations board

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§89-5 Hawaii labor relations board. (a) There is created a Hawaii labor relations board to ensure that collective bargaining is conducted in accordance with this chapter and that the merit principle under section 76-1 is maintained.

(b) The board shall be composed of three members of which one member shall be representative of management, one member shall be representative of labor, and the third member, the chairperson, shall be representative of the public. All members shall be appointed for terms of six years each in accordance with the following procedures:

(1) The representative of management shall be appointed by the governor, who may first consider any names submitted by the counties; provided that each county may submit no more than one name;

(2) The representative of labor shall be a person who is appointed by the governor and whose name has been submitted to the governor to serve as the representative of labor by the exclusive representatives certified pursuant to section 89-8. The process to determine the nominee whose name is to be submitted to the governor shall be determined by a simple majority of the exclusive representatives certified pursuant to section 89-8. The governor shall transmit the name of the person nominated to serve as the representative of labor to the senate for advice and consent; and

(3) The representative of the public shall be appointed by the governor.

(c) Each member shall hold office until the member's successor is appointed and qualified. Because cumulative experience and continuity in office are essential to the proper administration of this chapter, it is declared to be in the public interest to continue board members in office as long as efficiency is demonstrated, notwithstanding the provision of section 26-34, which limits the appointment of a member of a board or commission to two terms.

(d) The members shall devote full time to their duties as members of the board. Effective July 1, 2005, the chairperson of the board shall be paid a salary set at eighty-seven per cent of the salary of the director of labor and industrial relations, and the salary of each of the other members shall be ninety-five per cent of the chairperson's salary. No member shall hold any other public office or be in the employment of the State or a county, or any department or agency thereof, or any employee organization during the member's term.

(e) Any action taken by the board shall be by a simple majority of the members of the board. All decisions of the board shall be reduced to writing and shall state separately its finding of fact and conclusions. Any vacancy in the board shall not impair the authority of the remaining members to exercise all the powers of the board. The governor may appoint an acting member of the board in accordance with the procedures established in subsection (b) during the temporary absence from the State, temporary inability to act due to recusal, or illness of any regular member. An acting member, during the acting member's term of service, shall have the same powers and duties as the regular member; provided that subsection (d) shall not apply to an acting member and an acting member appointed due to a regular member's recusal shall be appointed for the case in which the recusal occurred, and the acting member's appointment shall terminate when the final decision is filed or the case is withdrawn.

(f) The chairperson of the board shall be responsible for the administrative functions of the board. The board may appoint an executive officer, attorneys, paralegals, mediators, arbitrators, and hearing officers, and other personnel as it may deem necessary in the performance of its functions, prescribe their duties, and fix their compensation and provide for reimbursement of actual and necessary expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties within the amounts made available by appropriations therefor. Section 28-8.3 notwithstanding, any attorney employed by the board as a full-time, part-time, or contract staff member may represent the board in litigation, draft legal documents for the board, and provide other necessary legal services to the board and shall not be deemed to be a deputy attorney general.

(g) The board shall be within the department of labor and industrial relations for budgetary and administrative purposes only. All members of the board and employees other than clerical and stenographic employees shall be exempt from chapters 76 and 89. Clerical and stenographic employees shall be appointed in accordance with chapter 76.

(h) At the close of each fiscal year, the board shall make a written report to the governor on its activities, including the cases and their dispositions, and the names, duties, and salaries of its officers and employees. Copies of the report shall be transmitted to the other chief executives, the exclusive representatives, and the legislative body of each jurisdiction.

(i) In addition to the powers and functions provided in other sections of this chapter, the board shall:

(1) Establish procedures for, investigate, and resolve any dispute concerning the designation of an appropriate bargaining unit and the application of section 89-6 to specific employees and positions;

(2) Establish procedures for, resolve disputes with respect to, and supervise the conduct of elections for the determination of employee representation;

(3) Resolve controversies under this chapter;

(4) Conduct proceedings on complaints of prohibited practices by employers, employees, and employee organizations and take such actions with respect thereto as it deems necessary and proper;

(5) Hold such hearings and make such inquiries, as it deems necessary, to carry out properly its functions and powers, and for the purpose of such hearings and inquiries, administer oaths and affirmations, examine witnesses and documents, take testimony and receive evidence, compel attendance of witnesses and the production of documents by the issuance of subpoenas, and delegate such powers to any member of the board or any person appointed by the board for the performance of its functions;

(6) Determine qualifications and establish, after reviewing nominations submitted by the public employers and employee organizations, lists of qualified persons, broadly representative of the public, to be available to serve as mediators, grievance arbitrators, or a combination thereof;

(7) Resolve disputes over the qualifications and criteria of the list of five qualified arbitrators provided pursuant to section 89-11(e)(2)(A);

(8) Establish a fair and reasonable range of daily or hourly rates at which mediators and arbitrators on the lists established under paragraph (6) are to be compensated;

(9) Conduct studies on problems pertaining to public employee-management relations, and make recommendations with respect thereto to the legislative bodies; request information and data from state and county departments and agencies and employee organizations necessary to carry out its functions and responsibilities; make available to all concerned parties, including mediators and arbitrators, statistical data relating to wages, benefits, and employment practices in public and private employment to assist them in resolving issues in negotiations;

(10) Adopt rules relative to the exercise of its powers and authority and to govern the proceedings before it in accordance with chapter 91; and

(11) Execute all of its responsibilities in a timely manner so as to facilitate and expedite the resolution of issues before it.

(j) For the purpose of minimizing travel and per diem expenses for parties who are not located on Oahu, the board shall utilize more cost efficient means such as teleconferencing which does not require appearances on Oahu, whenever practicable, to conduct its proceedings. Alternatively, it shall consider conducting its proceedings on another island whenever it is more cost efficient in consideration of the parties and the witnesses involved. [L 1970, c 171, pt of §2; am L 1971, c 49, §1; am L 1974, c 17, §1 and c 116, §2; am L 1975, c 58, §11; am L 1976, c 41, §1; am L 1978, c 196, §1; am L 1982, c 129, §3; am L 1983, c 10, §1 and c 11, §1; am L 1985, c 251, §4; gen ch 1985; am L 1986, c 128, §3; am L 1989, c 329, §2; am L 1990, c 140, §3; am L Sp 1993, c 8, §53; am L 2000, c 253, §95; am L 2001, c 55, §5; am L 2002, c 232, §1; am L 2005, c 226, §3; am L 2012, c 49, §1; am L 2013, c 95, §1; am L 2014, c 8, §1 and c 74, §1; am L 2019, c 231, §1; am L 2023, c 260, §1]

Attorney General Opinions

Member holding over will be a de jure, not merely a de facto, officer. Att. Gen. Op. 73-7.

Subsection (c) is constitutional, with regard to the use of the phrase "appointed and qualified" to describe when a successor's appointment terminates a holdover member's position. Att. Gen. Op. 16-3.

Case Notes

Hawaii public employment relations board is entitled to quasi-judicial immunity. 472 F. Supp. 1123.

Hawaii public employment relations board was empowered to make declaratory ruling regarding whether violation of collective bargaining agreement is a prohibited practice. 60 H. 436, 591 P.2d 113.

In exercising its jurisdiction to decide union complaint regarding State's request that union remove campaign materials from the union bulletin board on the fourth floor of state building to comply with the state ethics code, the Hawaii labor relations board was empowered to make such inquiries "as it deemed necessary and proper" under subsection (i)(4) with respect to the application of the ethics code; thus, during the hearing regarding the union's complaint, the board properly received the testimony of the executive director of the ethics commission pursuant to subsection (i)(5). 116 H. 73, 170 P.3d 324.

Subsection (b)(4) cited as empowering board to resolve disputes between employees and their unions. 2 H. App. 50, 625 P.2d 1046.

Section 89-11(a) does not limit the Hawaii labor relations board's authority to intervene when a party commits a prohibited practice by refusing to comply with the alternative impasse procedure. 132 H. 492 (App.), 323 P.3d 136 (2014).

Cited: 133 H. 188, 325 P.3d 600 (2014).

Discussed: 134 H. 489, 345 P.3d 155 (2015).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 25 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: Hawaii Gov't Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hawaii Gov't Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010). · cites it 11× “§ 89-5(a) (“There is created a Hawaii labor relations board to ensure that collective bargaining is conducted in accordance with this chapter .”

Gov't Employees Ass'n v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010). · cites it 14× “2005)) (brackets omitted) (citing HRS §§ 89-5(a); 89-5(i)(4); 89-1(b)(3)); and (b) "if the HLRB determined that the furlough plan constituted a valid exercise of [the Governor's] management rights," id.”

State v. Nakanelua, 345 P.3d 155 (Haw. 2015). · cites it 7× “17 More *506 over, whereas the parties were mandated to enter into an impasse procedure, the HLRB had the authority and responsibility of overseeing the entire alternate impasse process, under HRS § 89-ll(e) and the HLRB’s general powers, granted by HRS § 89-5. See HRS § 89-5(i)…”

United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 636, AFL-CIO v. Abercrombie., 325 P.3d 600 (Haw. 2014). · cites it 8× “Defendants argue that after the enactment of Act 253, UPW and the State have apparently argued over “whether original jurisdiction over claimed violations of HRS § 76-16(b),[33] as it relates to contracting out claims[34] rests with the HLRB pursuant to HRS §§ 89-5 and 89-9(d),…”

United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. Hanneman, 105 P.3d 236 (Haw. 2005). · cites it 2× “This Board has jurisdiction over this complaint under HRS §§ 89-5(b) and 89-14. 2. HRS § 89-13(a)(8) provides that it is a prohibited practice for an employer to violate the terms of the collective bargaining agreement.”

Aio v. Hamada, 664 P.2d 727 (Haw. 1983). · cites it 4× “" HRS § 89-5(b)(4). Furthermore, we customarily accord persuasive weight to the construction given words of broad and indefinite meaning by the agency charged with the responsibility of carrying out the mandate of the statute in question, unless the construction is palpably…”

United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. Yogi, 62 P.3d 189 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 2× “Similarly, the labor relations board, vested with the power to resolve labor disputes, see HRS § 89-5 (Supp.2001), and the legislature, which must approve or reject cost items in collective bargaining agreements, see HRS § 89-10 (1993), would gain from the direction provided by…”

In re United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, 315 P.3d 768 (Haw. App. 2013). · cites it 7× “6, 1981] (Auth: HRS § 89-5) (Imp: HRS §§ 89-5, 91-8) Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) § 12-42-9 (emphasis added).”

Jordan v. Hawaii Gov't Employees' Ass'n, Local 152, 472 F. Supp. 1123 (D. Haw. 1979). · cites it 4× “§ 89-5(a). 12 . Id. 13 . Id. 14 . See id.”

United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO v. Yogi, 62 P.3d 189 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 2× “The executive branch, which engages in bargaining with public worker unions, [6] as well as the chief negotiator for the state, [7] would obviously profit from instructions by this court as to the parameters of the law.”

Hawaii Pub. Emp. Relations Bd. v. United Pub. Workers, Local 646, 667 P.2d 783 (Haw. 1983). · cites it 2× “Additionally, HRS §91-12 and paragraph three of HRS § 89-5 require that all decisions of the Board be reduced to writing and accompanied by findings of fact.”

Winslow v. State, 625 P.2d 1046 (Haw. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “5 HRS § 89-5 Hawaii public employment relations board.”

Show all 25 citing cases →

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(a) — 5 cases

Hawaii Gov't Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010). “§ 89-5(a) (“There is created a Hawaii labor relations board to ensure that collective bargaining is conducted in accordance with this chapter .”

Gov't Employees Ass'n v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010). “2005)) (brackets omitted) (citing HRS §§ 89-5(a); 89-5(i)(4); 89-1(b)(3)); and (b) "if the HLRB determined that the furlough plan constituted a valid exercise of [the Governor's] management rights," id.”

United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 636, AFL-CIO v. Abercrombie., 325 P.3d 600 (Haw. 2014). “Defendants argue that after the enactment of Act 253, UPW and the State have apparently argued over “whether original jurisdiction over claimed violations of HRS § 76-16(b),[33] as it relates to contracting out claims[34] rests with the HLRB pursuant to HRS §§ 89-5 and 89-9(d),…”

Jordan v. Hawaii Gov't Employees' Ass'n, Local 152, 472 F. Supp. 1123 (D. Haw. 1979). “§ 89-5(a). 12 . Id. 13 . Id. 14 . See id.”

State v. Nakanelua, 323 P.3d 136 (Haw. App. 2014).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(b) — 3 cases

United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. Hanneman, 105 P.3d 236 (Haw. 2005). “This Board has jurisdiction over this complaint under HRS §§ 89-5(b) and 89-14. 2. HRS § 89-13(a)(8) provides that it is a prohibited practice for an employer to violate the terms of the collective bargaining agreement.”

Lee v. United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, 260 P.3d 1135 (Haw. App. 2011).

Jordan v. Hawaii Gov't Employees' Ass'n, Local 152, 472 F. Supp. 1123 (D. Haw. 1979). “§ 89-5(a). 12 . Id. 13 . Id. 14 . See id.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(b)(4) — 2 cases

Aio v. Hamada, 664 P.2d 727 (Haw. 1983). “" HRS § 89-5(b)(4). Furthermore, we customarily accord persuasive weight to the construction given words of broad and indefinite meaning by the agency charged with the responsibility of carrying out the mandate of the statute in question, unless the construction is palpably…”

Fasi v. State of Hawaii Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 591 P.2d 113 (Haw. 1979).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(b)(5) — 2 cases

Jordan v. Hawaii Gov't Employees' Ass'n, Local 152, 472 F. Supp. 1123 (D. Haw. 1979). “§ 89-5(a). 12 . Id. 13 . Id. 14 . See id.”

In re United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, 315 P.3d 768 (Haw. App. 2013). “6, 1981] (Auth: HRS § 89-5) (Imp: HRS §§ 89-5, 91-8) Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) § 12-42-9 (emphasis added).”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(e) — 1 case

Hawaii State Teachers Ass'n v. Hawaii Labor Relations Bd. (Haw. 2011).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(i) — 4 cases

State v. Nakanelua, 345 P.3d 155 (Haw. 2015). “17 More *506 over, whereas the parties were mandated to enter into an impasse procedure, the HLRB had the authority and responsibility of overseeing the entire alternate impasse process, under HRS § 89-ll(e) and the HLRB’s general powers, granted by HRS § 89-5. See HRS § 89-5(i)…”

State v. Nakanelua, 323 P.3d 136 (Haw. App. 2014).

State v. Nakaneula. (Haw. 2015).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(i)(10) — 2 cases

Shopo v. Hlrb, 153 Haw. 431 (Haw. App. 2023).

Hawaii State Teachers Ass'n v. Hawaii Labor Relations Bd. (Haw. 2012).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(i)(3) — 4 cases

Academic Labor United v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Hawai'i., 529 P.3d 680 (Haw. 2023).

In the Matter of United Pub. Workers, Afscme Local 646, Afl-Cio v. Watada, 233 P.3d 719 (Haw. App. 2010).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(i)(4) — 8 cases

In re Hawai'i Gov't Employees Ass'n, Local 152, 170 P.3d 324 (Haw. 2007).

State v. Nakanelua, 323 P.3d 136 (Haw. App. 2014).

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 89-5(i)(9) — 1 case

Shopo v. Hlrb, 153 Haw. 431 (Haw. App. 2023).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.