Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 33-118

Courses of study — Curricular materials. 

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Courses of study — Curricular materials. 

(1) The state board shall prescribe the minimum courses to be taught in all public elementary and secondary schools, and shall cause to be prepared and issued, such syllabi, study guides and other instructional aids as the board shall from time to time deem necessary.

(2)  The board shall determine how and under what rules curricular materials shall be adopted for the public schools, including the fees necessary to defray the cost of such adoption process. The board shall require all publishers of textbooks approved for use to furnish the department of education with electronic format for literary and nonliterary subjects when electronic formats become available for nonliterary subjects, in a standard format approved by the board, from which reproductions can be made for use by the blind.
(3)  The board shall, by rule, determine the process by which the department of education reviews and approves online courses, pursuant to section 33-1024, Idaho Code, and the fees necessary to defray the department’s cost of such review and approval process.
(4)  The board of trustees of each school district may adopt their own curricular materials consistent with the provisions of section 33-512A, Idaho Code. Curricular materials adopted must be consistent with Idaho content standards as established by the state board of education.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case: Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. Evans
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. Evans (1993) idaho · cites it 8× “9 § 1 with the political difficulties of that task has been made simpler for this Court because the executive branch of the government has already promulgated educational standards pursuant to the legislature's directive in I.C. § 33-118. See State Board of Education Rules and…”
Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity Ex Rel. Eikum v. Idaho State Board of Education Ex Rel. Mossman (1996) idaho · cites it 2× “9, § 1; (2) that the politically difficult task of defining thoroughness has been simplified because the executive branch (the State Board of Education (the Board)) has already promulgated educational standards under the legislative directive of I.C. § 33-118; (3) that the…”
Nampa Classical Academy v. Goesling (2010) idd · cites it 3× “See Idaho Code §§ 33-118 , 33-118A. 18 In addition, Idaho Constitution, Article IX, § 6 is a provision of law to which NCA is subject and must comply with and states: § 6.”
Mike Zeyen v. Bonneville Joint District (2024) ca9 “Idaho Code § 33-118 . Furthermore, Article IX, § 2 of the Idaho Constitution explicitly contemplates plenary local supervision, regulation, and governance of public schools by local school boards: The general supervision of the state educational institutions and public school…”
Idaho Migrant Council v. Board of Education (1981) ca9 “For example, the State Board is required to “supervise all school districts,” Idaho Code § 33-116 , “prescribe the minimum courses to be taught in all elementary and secondary schools,” Idaho Code § 33-118 , and “set forth minimum requirements to be met by public, private and…”
Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. State (1998) idaho · cites it 2× “9 § 1 with the political difficulties of that task has been made simpler for this Court because the executive branch of the government has already promulgated educational standards pursuant to the legislature’s directive in I.”
ISEEO v. State (1998) idaho · cites it 2× “In ISEEO I, the Court discussed thoroughness, as follows: Balancing our constitutional duty to define the meaning of the thoroughness requirement of art. 9 § 1 with the political difficulties of that task has been made simpler for this Court because the executive branch of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.