Curing error from opening statement references to defendant
Also stated as: Opening Statement Error and Harmlessness
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Curing error from opening statement references to defendant
Ranked by how often Illinois courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Illinois opinions citing these pages
- People v. Mabry, 2023 IL App (3d) 200321-U
- People v. Morrison, 2020 IL App (1st) 172626-U
- People v. Sandifer, 2016 IL App (1st) 133397
- People v. Sandifer, 2016 IL App (1st) 133397, 65 N.E.3d 969
- People v. Risper, 2015 IL App (1st) 130993, 34 N.E.3d 627
- People v. Moore, 824 N.E.2d 1162 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2005)
- People v. MacRi, 705 N.E.2d 772 (Ill. 1998)
- People v. Marci, No. 80107 (Ill. Oct. 29, 1998)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 23 opinions
- 30 opinions
- 14 opinions
- 120 opinions
- 8 opinions
- 49 opinions
- 8 opinions
Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law