Determining reversible error regarding opening statement denial
Also stated as: Opening Statement Error and Harmlessness
33 Texas opinions cite these pages1992–20234 pages cited by Texas courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining reversible error regarding opening statement denial
- Cited for: Preserving error when denying opening statement right
- Cited for: Analyzing harmless error in denying opening statement
- Cited for: Failing to preserve error regarding opening statements
Ranked by how often Texas courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Texas opinions citing these pages
- McGowen v. State, 944 S.W.2d 481 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997)
- Moore v. State, 868 S.W.2d 787 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)
- Edward MacIas Jr. v. State of Texas, No. 13-21-00091-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Apr. 21, 2022)
- Paroline v. State, 532 S.W.3d 491 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2017)
- Richard McKinnley Nixon v. State, No. 09-15-00421-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 24, 2016)
- Lora Ann Forrest v. State, No. 02-13-00557-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 22, 2015)
- Olen Ware II v. State, No. 01-13-00545-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 2, 2014)
- Khaleem Hasan Guillory v. State, 397 S.W.3d 864 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013)
- Mauro Ibarra v. State, No. 08-05-00207-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Aug. 30, 2007)
- Schultze v. State, 177 S.W.3d 26 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005)
- Schultze, Eric Vaughn v. State, No. 01-02-00210-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 13, 2005)
- Flores v. State, 125 S.W.3d 744 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003)
- Guadalupe Guerrero Flores v. State, No. 01-02-01079-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 18, 2003)
- Lopez v. State, 96 S.W.3d 406 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003)
- Robles v. State, 104 S.W.3d 649 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 35 opinions
- 17 opinions
- 114 opinions
- 57 opinions
- 306 opinions
- 219 opinions
- 299 opinions
- 323 opinions
Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law