Illinois Compiled Statutes

105 ILCS 5/10-22.5 (2026)

Assignment of pupils to schools - Non-resident pupils - Tuition - Race discrimination

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(105 ILCS 5/10-22.5) (from Ch. 122, par. 10-22.5)
    Sec. 10-22.5. Assignment of pupils to schools - Non-resident pupils - Tuition - Race discrimination. To assign pupils to the several schools in the district; to admit non-resident pupils when it can be done without prejudice to the rights of resident pupils and provide them with any services of the school including transportation; to fix the rates of tuition in accordance with Section 10-20.12a, and to collect and pay the same to the treasurer for the use of the district; but no pupil shall be excluded from or segregated in any such school on account of his color, race, sex, or nationality. Nothing herein shall be construed to permit or empower the State Board of Education to order, mandate or require busing or other transportation of pupils for the purpose of achieving racial balance in any school.
(Source: P.A. 81-1508.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: Clarke v. Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 303, 2012 IL App (2d) 110705 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
Clarke v. Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 303, 2012 IL App (2d) 110705 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “3 (West 2010)); “[t]o assign pupils to the several schools in the district” (105 ILCS 5/10-22.5 (West 2010)); “[t]o have control and supervision of all public schoolhouses in their district” (105 ILCS 5/10-22.”
Clarke v. Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 303, 2014 IL App (2d) 131016 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “3 ( West 2010 )); “[t]o assign pupils to the several schools in the district” (105 ILCS 5/10-22.5 ( West 2010 )); “[t]o have the control and supervision of all public schoolhouses in their district” (105 ILCS 5/10-22.”
Clarke v. Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 303, 2014 IL App (2d) 131016 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “3 ( West 2010 )); “[t]o assign pupils to the several schools in the district” (105 ILCS 5/10-22.5 ( West 2010 )); “[t]o have the control and supervision of all public schoolhouses in their district” (105 ILCS 5/10-22.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.