Illinois Compiled Statutes
110 ILCS 935/10 (2026)
Scholarship recipients who fail to fulfill the obligation described in subsection (d) of Section 3
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(110 ILCS 935/10)
(from Ch. 144, par. 1460)
Sec. 10.
Scholarship recipients who fail to fulfill the
obligation described in subsection (d) of Section 3.07 of this
Act shall pay to the Department a sum equal to 3 times the amount
of the annual scholarship grant for each year the
recipient fails to fulfill such obligation. A scholarship recipient who
fails to fulfill the obligation described in subsection (d) of Section 3.07
shall have 30 days from the date on which that failure begins in which to enter
into a contract with the Department that sets forth the manner in which that
sum is required to be paid. If the contract is not entered into within that 30
day period or if the contract is entered into but the required payments are not
made in the amounts and at the times provided in the contract, the scholarship
recipient also shall be required to pay to the Department interest at the rate
of 9% per annum on the amount of that sum remaining due and unpaid. The
amounts paid to the Department
under this Section shall be deposited into the Community Health
Center Care Fund and shall be used by the Department to improve
access to primary health care services as authorized by subsection (a) of
Section
2310-200 of the Department of Public Health Powers and
Duties
LawNotes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 2001–2006 · leading case: People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Health v. Wiley, 843 N.E.2d 259 (Ill. 2006).
People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Health v. Wiley, 843 N.E.2d 259 (Ill. 2006). “(West 2002)), and that the Department was entitled to treble damages under section 10 of the same statute (110 ILCS 935/10 (West 2002)). The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the Department.”
Illinois Dept. of Pub. Health v. Jackson, 747 N.E.2d 474 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “See 110 ILCS 935/10 (West 1998). On January 14, 2000, the circuit court entered summary judgment in favor of the Department in the amount of $67,175, plus prejudgment interest of $14,911.”
People ex rel. Dep't of Pub. Health v. Wiley, 810 N.E.2d 614 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “The Department alleged that plaintiff breached the contracts and sought triple damages pursuant to section 10 of the Act (110 ILCS 935/10 (West 2002)). The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Department, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied…”
People Ex Rel. Dept. of Pub. Hlth. v. Wiley, 810 N.E.2d 614 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “The Department alleged that plaintiff breached the contracts and sought triple damages pursuant to section 10 of the Act (110 ILCS 935/10 (West 2002)). The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Department, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied…”
Hilary Krawczyk v. Livaditis, 851 N.E.2d 862 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “” 110 ILCS 935/10 (West 2002). This language expressly refers to penalties for “each year” of an annual scholarship.”
People v. Wiley (Ill. 2006). “(West 2002)), and that the Department was entitled to treble damages under section 10 of the same statute (110 ILCS 935/10 (West 2002)). The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the Department.”
Illinois Dep't of Pub. Health v. Jackson (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “See 110 ILCS 935/10 (West 1998). On January 14, 2000, the circuit court entered summary judgment in favor of the Department in the amount of $67,175, plus prejudgment interest of $14,911.”
Krawczyk v. Livaditis (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “" 110 ILCS 935/10 (West 2002). This language expressly refers to penalties for "each year" of an annual scholarship.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.