Illinois Compiled Statutes
20 ILCS 415/2 (2026)
Purpose
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(20 ILCS 415/2)
(from Ch. 127, par. 63b102)
Sec. 2.
Purpose.
The purpose of the Personnel Code is to establish for the government of
the State of Illinois a system of personnel administration under the
Governor, based on merit principles and scientific methods.
(Source: Laws 1955, p. 2208.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1996–2005 · leading case: Metzger v. DaRosa, 805 N.E.2d 1165 (Ill. 2004).
Metzger v. DaRosa, 805 N.E.2d 1165 (Ill. 2004). “The stated purpose of the Personnel Code is "to establish for the government of the State of Illinois a system of personnel administration under the Governor, based on merit principles and scientific methods.”
Denton v. Civil Serv. Com'n of State, 679 N.E.2d 1234 (Ill. 1997). “The Personnel Code is "based on merit principles and scientific methods" (20 ILCS 415/2 (West 1992)), and, as this case illustrates, sometimes only the selection of a nonveteran over a veteran is consistent with that foundation.”
Dep't of Revenue v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 827 N.E.2d 960 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “" 20 ILCS 415/2 (West 2000). The Code is administered by CMS and establishes, inter alia, the five-member Civil Service Commission.”
Denton v. Civil Serv. Com'n of State, 661 N.E.2d 520 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “) An absolute preference for veterans within a given category rating does not translate to a "guarantee” of State employment.”
Metzger v. DaRosa (Ill. 2004). “” 20 ILCS 415/2 (West 2002). Metzger argues that the plain language of section 2 of the Personnel Code indicates that it was designed to protect civil service employees.”
Denton v. Civil Serv. Comm'n (Ill. 1997). “The Personnel Code is "based on merit principles and scientific methods" (20 ILCS 415/2 (West 1992)), and, as this case illustrates, sometimes only the selection of a nonveteran over a veteran is consistent with that foundation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|