Illinois Compiled Statutes
225 ILCS 454/15-25 (2026)
Licensee's relationship with customers
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 454/15-25)
(Section scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2030)
Sec. 15-25. Licensee's relationship with customers. Licensees shall treat all customers honestly and shall not negligently
or knowingly give
them false information. A licensee engaged by a seller client shall timely
disclose to customers
who are prospective buyers all latent material adverse facts pertaining to the
physical condition of
the property that are actually known by the licensee and that could not be
discovered by a
reasonably diligent inspection of the property by the customer. A licensee
shall not be liable to a
customer for providing false information to the customer if the false
information was provided to
the licensee by the licensee's client and the licensee did not have actual
knowledge that the
information was false. No cause of action shall arise on behalf of any person
against a licensee for
revealing information in compliance with this Section.
(Source: P.A. 101-357, eff. 8-9-19.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2003–2024 · leading case: Bhayani v. Sood (In Re Bhayani), 293 B.R. 911 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2003).
Bhayani v. Sood (In Re Bhayani), 293 B.R. 911 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2003). “See 225 ILCS 454/15-25(a), 454/15-15(a)(2)(C).”
Edson v. Fogarty, 2019 IL App (1st) 181135, 138 N.E.3d 238. “” 225 ILCS 454/15-25 (West 2016). The act defines a customer as someone “who is not being represented by the licensee but for whom the licensee is performing ministerial acts.”
Revite Corp. v. 24254 Chicago, Inc., 2024 IL App (1st) 221713-U. “¶ 22 Count III alleged Jerry Kulas breached his duties as a licensee under section 15-25(a) of the Act (225 ILCS 454/15-25(a) (West 2022) by failing to inform Revite it did not own the area in front of the commercial units and could not install a fence.”
Edson v. Horwich, 2024 IL App (1st) 221877-U. “¶ 63 Finally, we address Plaintiffs’ claim that the circuit court erred by finding for Defendants on the License Act claim because it erroneously based its ruling on an unreasonable inference that the seller provided the zoning information.”
Manaster v. Bernfield, 2021 IL App (2d) 200161-U. “-3- 2021 IL App (2d) 200161-U The next four counts were against Coldwell Banker, based on the actions of their agents, the husband-and-wife partners Ira Rumick and Fran Coulter: (1) common law aiding and abetting a fraud (count IV); (2) common law negligence (count VII); (3)…”
225 ILCS 454/15-25(a): 2 cases
Bhayani v. Sood (In Re Bhayani), 293 B.R. 911 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2003). “See 225 ILCS 454/15-25(a), 454/15-15(a)(2)(C).”
Revite Corp. v. 24254 Chicago, Inc., 2024 IL App (1st) 221713-U. “¶ 22 Count III alleged Jerry Kulas breached his duties as a licensee under section 15-25(a) of the Act (225 ILCS 454/15-25(a) (West 2022) by failing to inform Revite it did not own the area in front of the commercial units and could not install a fence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|