ILCS » Chapter 225 · Act 735
Illinois Compiled Statutes

225 ILCS 735/1 (2026)

This Act may be known and cited as the "Timber Buyers Licensing Act"

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 735/1) (from Ch. 111, par. 701)
    Sec. 1. This Act may be known and cited as the "Timber Buyers Licensing Act".
(Source: P.A. 76-1307.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2024 · leading case: Edwards v. Atterberry, 2019 IL 123370 (Ill. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Edwards v. Atterberry, 2019 IL 123370 (Ill. 2019). “¶2 BACKGROUND ¶3 Edwards was charged by information with two violations of the Timber Buyers Licensing Act (225 ILCS 735/1 et seq. (West 2016)). The information referred to each of these violations as constituting a Class A misdemeanor, which Edwards disputes.”
Edwards v. Atterberry, 2019 IL 123370 (Ill. 2019). “¶2 BACKGROUND ¶3 Edwards was charged by information with two violations of the Timber Buyers Licensing Act (225 ILCS 735/1 et seq. (West 2016)). The information referred to each of these violations as constituting a Class A misdemeanor, which Edwards disputes.”
People v. Edwards, 2021 IL App (4th) 210116-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “Edwards, was convicted of two Class A misdemeanors for his purported violations of an administrative rule promulgated under the Timber Buyers Licensing Act (Act) (225 ILCS 735/1 et seq. (West 2016)). Defendant appeals, challenging the (1) circuit court’s subject-matter…”
Edwards v. Atterberry (C.D. Ill. 2020). “BACKGROUND Edwards was charged and convicted in Illinois state court of two counts under the Timber Buyers Licensing Act (“TBLA”), 225 ILCS 735/1−16. Am. Compl. ¶¶ 17, 22, ECF No.”
People v. Martin, 2024 IL App (4th) 240629 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “Defendant failed to comply with the payment order, and Roberts subsequently filed a “Motion to Hold Defendant in Contempt.” The trial court struck Roberts’s pleading on the basis that he lacked standing to initiate contempt proceedings in defendant’s underlying criminal case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.