30 ILCS 540/0.01
Short title
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(30 ILCS 540/0.01)
(from Ch. 127, par. 132.400)
Sec. 0.01.
Short title.
This Act may be cited as the
State Prompt Payment Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2021 · leading case: Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder
Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder (1999)
“(West 1996)), the State Prompt Payment Act (30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)), the Illinois Income Tax Act (35 ILCS 5/101 et seq.”
Herricane Graphics, Inc. v. Blinderman Construction Co. (2004)
“Plaintiff cross-appeals the trial court’s failure to award plaintiff interest under the State Prompt Payment Act (Payment Act) (30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq. (2002)) and the court’s failure to compensate plaintiff for the labor-related component of its work.”
Illinois Health Care Ass'n v. Wright (1994)
“(West 1992)); (2) whether Carl Lindner should have been permitted to testify as an expert witness; and (3) whether as a matter of law the plaintiffs must demonstrate efficiency and economy of their nursing home operations as part of a prima facie case alleging violations of the…”
Midwest Emergency Associates-Elgin, Ltd. v. Harmony Health Plan of Illinois, Inc. (2008)
“Midwest based its complaint on theories of quantum meruit, unjust enrichment and the State Prompt Payment Act (30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq. (West 2006)). In response, Harmony Health filed motions to dismiss under sections 2 — 619 and 2 — 615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure.”
Korte & Luitjohan Contractors, Inc. v. Thiems Construction Co. (2008)
“Plaintiff alleged a breach of contract and a violation of the State Prompt Payment Act (30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq. (West 2000)) and sought to foreclose a lien on public funds.”
Omega Demolition Corporation v. Judlau Contracting, Inc (2020)
“Count IV was a claim against defendant for interest under the State Prompt Payment Act (30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq. (West 2018)). Count V, pleaded in the alternative to count II, sought recovery in quantum meruit against defendant.”
H.B.D. Construction, Inc. v. Eco Jazz, Inc. (2021)
“The appellant, Town & Country Masonry and Tuckpointing, LLC (Town & Country), appeals the amount of damages awarded to it against HBD in connection with its masonry work that it completed as a subcontractor on this project, the court’s denial of its request for attorney fees,…”
Korte & Luitjohan Contractors v. Thiems Construction Company (2008)
“Plaintiff alleged a breach of contract and a violation of the State Prompt Payment Act (30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq. (West 2000)) and sought to foreclose a lien on public funds.”
Herricane Graphics, Inc. v. Blinderman Construction Co. (2004)
“Plaintiff cross-appeals the trial court's failure to award plaintiff interest under the State Prompt Payment Act (Payment Act) (30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq. (2002)) and the court's failure to compensate plaintiff for the labor-related component of its work.”
Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. State (2001)
“(30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq.) When the bill was not paid by September 29, Claimant filed with the Court of Claims.”
Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder (1999)
“(West 1996)), the State Prompt Payment Act (30 ILCS 540/0.01 et seq . (West 1996)), the Illinois Income Tax Act (35 ILCS 5/101 et seq .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|