ILCS » Chapter 410 · Act 130
Illinois Compiled Statutes

410 ILCS 130/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 130/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Program Act.
(Source: P.A. 101-363, eff. 8-9-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (19 in the last 5 years), 2014–2026 · leading case: People v. Hill, 2020 IL 124595 (Ill. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Hill, 2020 IL 124595 (Ill. 2020). “¶ 18 Because the record shows more than the odor of raw cannabis was considered, we need not address the validity of Stout after the enactment of the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act (Act) (410 ILCS 130/1 et seq. (West 2016)) and decriminalization of…”
People v. Stribling, 2022 IL App (3d) 210098 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 2× “Then, in 2016, Public Act 99-697 began to decriminalize cannabis. Pub. Act 99-697, § 40 (eff. July 29, 2016) (amending 720 ILCS 550/4).”
Medponics Illinois LLC v. Dept. of Agric., 2021 IL 125443 (Ill. 2021). “(West 2014)) and the correlating rules adopted by the Illinois Department of Agriculture (Administrative Rules) governing its enforcement of the relevant provisions of the Act (see 8 Ill. Adm. Code 1000; 410 ILCS 130/15(b) (West 2014)) and how those impact the propriety of the…”
People v. Rowell, 2021 IL App (4th) 180819 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “See 410 ILCS 130/1 et seq. (West 2014). In 2016, the State of Illinois passed a law stating that a licensed user of medical cannabis “shall not be considered an unlawful user” and that medical cannabis “purchased by a qualifying patient at a licensed dispensing organization…”
People v. Redmond, 2024 IL 129201 (Ill. 2024). “Nevertheless, the Vehicle Code prohibited the use of cannabis in a motor vehicle (625 ILCS 5/11-502.”
People v. Molina, 2024 IL 129237 (Ill. 2024). “1, 2014) (adding 410 ILCS 130/1 et seq.). The Medical Act made it lawful for certain individuals with debilitating medical conditions to possess and use cannabis.”
People v. Mallery, 2023 IL App (4th) 220528 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “See 410 ILCS 130/1 et seq. (West 2014). In 2016, the State of Illinois passed a law stating that a licensed user of medical cannabis ‘shall not be considered an unlawful user’ and that medical cannabis ‘purchased by a qualifying patient at a licensed dispensing organization…”
Jennifer Scherr v. City of Chicago, 757 F.3d 593 (7th Cir. 2014). “And at the time there was no medicinal exception in Illinois to the prohibition of possessing marijuana, as there is now, 410 ILCS 130/1 et seq. Moreover, there was and still is no medicinal exception in the federal law criminaliz *597 ing possession of marijuana (even simple…”
People v. Hall, 2023 IL App (4th) 220209 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “¶ 18 In Hill, the supreme court chose not to overturn Stout after the enactment of the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act (410 ILCS 130/1 et seq. (West 2016)). Hill, 2020 IL 124595, ¶ 15 .”
People v. Redmond, 2022 IL App (3d) 210524 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “Next, it was noted that the possession of medical cannabis was partially allowed by the legislature in 2013 with the enactment of the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act (410 ILCS 130/1 et seq. (West 2014)). Stribling, 2022 IL App (3d) 210098, ¶ 17 .”
People v. Harris, 2023 IL App (2d) 210697 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “¶ 18 (“Because the record shows more than the odor of raw cannabis was considered, we need not address the validity of Stout after the enactment of the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act *** (410 ILCS 130/1 et seq. (West 2016)) and decriminalization of…”
Three v. The Dep't of Pub. Health, 2017 IL App (1st) 162548 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “, denied the petition, and plaintiff sought judicial review under the Administrative Review Law (Review Law) (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq. (West 2014)). The circuit court reversed and remanded the case to the No.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.