ILCS » Chapter 410 · Act 305
Illinois Compiled Statutes

410 ILCS 305/1 (2026)

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "AIDS Confidentiality Act"

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 305/1) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 7301)
    Sec. 1. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "AIDS Confidentiality Act".
(Source: P.A. 85-677; 85-679.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1994–2019 · leading case: Rosenbach v. Six Flags Ent. Corp., 2019 IL 123186 (Ill. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rosenbach v. Six Flags Ent. Corp., 2019 IL 123186 (Ill. 2019). “¶ 26 In contrast is the AIDS Confidentiality Act ( 410 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2016) ). There, the legislature authorized private rights of action for monetary relief, attorney fees, and such other relief as the court may deem appropriate, including an injunction, by any person…”
Doe v. Chand, 781 N.E.2d 340 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 2× “(defendants), alleging, inter alia, a violation of the AIDS Confidentiality Act (Act) (410 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1998)). Doe testified that in February 1999 she learned that her husband had tested positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).”
Dennis Anderson v. Gilberto Romero & Arthur Douglas, 72 F.3d 518 (7th Cir. 1995). “The complaint charged that the defendants had violated both Anderson’s constitutional right of privacy and the Illinois AIDS Confidentiality Act, 410 ILCS 305/1 et seq., by revealing that he was infected with the AIDS virus, and also that they had deprived him of the equal…”
Sekura v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc., 2018 IL App (1st) 180175 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “, [ (West 2016) ] and the AIDS Confidentiality Act, 410 ILCS 305/1, et seq. , [ (West 2016) ] provide for a substantially identical, 'any person aggrieved' right of recovery and have been interpreted as not requiring actual damages be pled.”
Gomez v. the Finishing Co., Inc., 861 N.E.2d 189 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “In Doe, the court reversed the award of punitive damages after concluding that the statute at issue, the AIDS Confidentiality Act (410 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1998)), did not provide for punitive damages.”
Rosenbach v. Six Flags Ent. Corp., 2019 IL 123186 (Ill. 2019). “¶ 26 In contrast is the AIDS Confidentiality Act (410 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2016)). There, the legislature authorized private rights of action for monetary relief, attorney fees, and such other relief as the court may deem appropriate, including an injunction, by any person…”
Glasco v. Marony, 808 N.E.2d 1107 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 2× “Glasco, filed her complaint against the defendants, George Marony and Joseph Goodge, and alleged that the defendants had violated the AIDS Confidentiality Act (the Act) (410 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2000)). The defendants served their request for admissions on the plaintiff, and…”
In Re Marriage of Bonneau, 691 N.E.2d 123 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “Petitioner refused to produce the requested records, despite a trial court order to the contrary, arguing that the records were protected from disclosure under the privilege established in the AIDS Confidentiality Act (Act) (410 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1996)). As a result, the…”
Sekura v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc., 2018 IL App (1st) 180175 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “, [(West 2016)] and the AIDS Confidentiality Act, 410 ILCS 305/1, et seq., [(West 2016)] provide for a substantially identical, ‘any person aggrieved’ right of recovery and have been interpreted as not requiring actual damages be pled.”
Doe v. Dilling, 861 N.E.2d 1052 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “Once we determine that Doe should have been on notice of her own condition, as a matter of law, it becomes clear that she should have directed any concerns about having been infected with HIV to a health professional, rather than repeatedly seeking assurances from the Dillings…”
Doe v. City of Chicago, 883 F. Supp. 1126 (N.D. Ill. 1994). “The Illinois AIDS Confidentiality Act Plaintiffs allege that defendants’ failure to obtain plaintiffs’ consent to HIV testing and failure to provide plaintiffs counseling in connection with the HIV test violated the Illinois AIDS Confidentiality Act (“IACA”), 410 ILCS 305/1 et…”
Goins v. Mercy Ctr. for Health Care Servs., 667 N.E.2d 652 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “Count VI alleged various violations of the AIDS Confidentiality Act (Confidentiality Act) (410 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1992)) against Mercy Center.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.